Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2427
Title: Association of antioxidant-added highly cross-linked polyethylene on revision risk: a registry-based study of 198,073 total hip replacements from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry between 2014 and 2023.
Epworth Authors: de Steiger, Richard
Other Authors: Lewis, Peter
Campbell, David
Du, Peiyao
Oakey, Helena
Smith, Paul
Keywords: Antioxidants
Cross-linked Polyethylene
XLPE
Total Hip Replacement
THR
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry
Long Term Performance
Modular Cementless Acetabular Inserts
Ceramic Femoral Head
Metal Femoral Head
Orthopaedic
Revision
Musculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: Jan-2026
Publisher: MJS Publishing
Citation: Acta Orthop. 2026 Jan 23;97:28–34
Abstract: Background and purpose: Adding antioxidant to highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) is proposed to improve oxidation resistance and decrease wear in total hip replacements (THR), but long-term performance is unknown. We aimed to compare the revision rates of THR using cementless acetabular components where the insert was made of either XLPE with antioxidant (AOXLPE) or XLPE, using data from a large national registry. Methods: The population was THR from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) in the 10-year period 2014–2023 with modular cementless acetabular components and ceramic or metal femoral heads used for osteoarthritis. We compared primary THR using XLPE with antioxidant (AOXLPE) acetabular inserts with XLPE acetabular inserts. The outcome measured was all-cause revision. Cumulative percentage revision (CPR) was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and comparisons made using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: There were 198,073 THRs, of which 35,309 had AOXLPE inserts. There were 769 and 4,327 revisions with AOXLPE and XLPE inserts, respectively. While there was no early difference, the AOXLPE group had a lower revision rate after 3 years (HR 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48–0.84). When adjusted for multiple factors the AOXLPE group still had a lower revision rate after 3 years (HR 0.63, CI 0.47–0.83). Revisions for loosening, wear-related causes, and fracture were proportionately lower in the AOXLPE group, but no difference was found with revisions for dislocation/instability or infection. Conclusion: While there was no early difference, THR with AOXLPE acetabular inserts had a lower revision rate after 3 years than XLPE. This suggests a possible clinical benefit using AOXLPE but the difference may, in part, be related to the associated femoral or acetabular components.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2427
DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2025.45181
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41575536/
ISSN: 1745-3674
Journal Title: Acta Orthopaedica
Type: Journal Article
Affiliated Organisations: Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), Adelaide
Wakefield Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Adelaide, Adelaide
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide
University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne
Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Comparative Study
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
Richard de Steiger 2026.pdf646.61 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.