Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2427
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Steiger, Richard-
dc.contributor.otherLewis, Peter-
dc.contributor.otherCampbell, David-
dc.contributor.otherDu, Peiyao-
dc.contributor.otherOakey, Helena-
dc.contributor.otherSmith, Paul-
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-06T04:42:09Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-06T04:42:09Z-
dc.date.issued2026-01-
dc.identifier.citationActa Orthop. 2026 Jan 23;97:28–34en_US
dc.identifier.issn1745-3674en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/2427-
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose: Adding antioxidant to highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) is proposed to improve oxidation resistance and decrease wear in total hip replacements (THR), but long-term performance is unknown. We aimed to compare the revision rates of THR using cementless acetabular components where the insert was made of either XLPE with antioxidant (AOXLPE) or XLPE, using data from a large national registry. Methods: The population was THR from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) in the 10-year period 2014–2023 with modular cementless acetabular components and ceramic or metal femoral heads used for osteoarthritis. We compared primary THR using XLPE with antioxidant (AOXLPE) acetabular inserts with XLPE acetabular inserts. The outcome measured was all-cause revision. Cumulative percentage revision (CPR) was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and comparisons made using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: There were 198,073 THRs, of which 35,309 had AOXLPE inserts. There were 769 and 4,327 revisions with AOXLPE and XLPE inserts, respectively. While there was no early difference, the AOXLPE group had a lower revision rate after 3 years (HR 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48–0.84). When adjusted for multiple factors the AOXLPE group still had a lower revision rate after 3 years (HR 0.63, CI 0.47–0.83). Revisions for loosening, wear-related causes, and fracture were proportionately lower in the AOXLPE group, but no difference was found with revisions for dislocation/instability or infection. Conclusion: While there was no early difference, THR with AOXLPE acetabular inserts had a lower revision rate after 3 years than XLPE. This suggests a possible clinical benefit using AOXLPE but the difference may, in part, be related to the associated femoral or acetabular components.en_US
dc.publisherMJS Publishingen_US
dc.subjectAntioxidantsen_US
dc.subjectCross-linked Polyethyleneen_US
dc.subjectXLPEen_US
dc.subjectTotal Hip Replacementen_US
dc.subjectTHRen_US
dc.subjectAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registryen_US
dc.subjectLong Term Performanceen_US
dc.subjectModular Cementless Acetabular Insertsen_US
dc.subjectCeramic Femoral Headen_US
dc.subjectMetal Femoral Headen_US
dc.subjectOrthopaedicen_US
dc.subjectRevisionen_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleAssociation of antioxidant-added highly cross-linked polyethylene on revision risk: a registry-based study of 198,073 total hip replacements from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry between 2014 and 2023.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2340/17453674.2025.45181en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleActa Orthopaedicaen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41575536/en_US
dc.description.affiliatesAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), Adelaideen_US
dc.description.affiliatesWakefield Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Adelaide, Adelaideen_US
dc.description.affiliatesSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaideen_US
dc.description.affiliatesUniversity of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourneen_US
dc.description.affiliatesAustralian National University, Canberra, Australiaen_US
dc.type.studyortrialComparative Studyen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
Richard de Steiger 2026.pdf646.61 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.