Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1228
Title: | A combined randomised and observational study of surgery for fractures in the distal radius in the elderly (CROSSFIRE)-a study protocol. |
Epworth Authors: | Richardson, Martin |
Other Authors: | Harris, Ian Naylor, Justine Lawson, Andrew Buchbinder, Rachel Ivers, Rebecca Balogh, Zsolt Smith, Paul Mittal, Rajat Xuan, Wei Howard, Kirsten Vafa, Arezoo Yates, Piers Rieger, Bertram Smith, Geoff Elkinson, Ilia Kim, Woosung Chehade, Mellick Sungaran, Jai Latendresse, Kim Wong, James Viswanathan, Sameer Shrestha, Kush Drobetz, Herwig Tran, Phong Loveridge, Jeremy Page, Richard Hau, Raphael Bingham, Roger Mulford, Jonathan Incoll, Ian |
Keywords: | Older Population Cost-Benefit Fracture Fixation Patient Reported Outcome Radius Fractures Aged Osteoporosis Falls Risk Treatment Management Cast Immobilisation Closed Reduction Open Reduction Plate Fixation Plating Surgical Treatments Surgical Fixation Conservative Treatments Casting Surgical Management Practice Variation Clinical Outcomes Cost-Effective Risks Distal Radius Fractures Standards of Care Combined Randomised and Observational Study of Surgery for Fractures In the distal Radius in the Elderly CROSSFIRE Musculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia |
Issue Date: | Jun-2017 |
Publisher: | BMJ Publishing |
Citation: | BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e016100 |
Abstract: | Fractures of the distal radius are common and occur in all age groups. The incidence is high in older populations due to osteoporosis and increased falls risk. Considerable practice variation exists in the management of distal radius fractures in older patients ranging from closed reduction with cast immobilisation to open reduction with plate fixation. Plating is currently the most common surgical treatment. While there is evidence showing no significant advantage for some forms of surgical fixation over conservative treatment, and no difference between different surgical techniques, there is a lack of evidence comparing two of the most common treatments used: closed reduction and casting versus plating. Surgical management involves significant costs and risks compared with conservative management. High-level evidence is required to address practice variation, justify costs and to provide the best clinical outcomes for patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This pragmatic, multicentre randomised comparative effectiveness trial aims to determine whether plating leads to better pain and function and is more cost-effective than closed reduction and casting of displaced distal radius fractures in adults aged 60 years and older. The trial will compare the two techniques but will also follow consenting patients who are unwilling to be randomised in a separate, observational cohort. Inclusion of non-randomised patients addresses selection bias, provides practice and outcome insights about standard care, and improves the generalisability of the results from the randomised trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: CROSSFIRE(Combined Randomised and Observational Study of Surgery for Fractures In the distal Radius in the Elderly) was reviewed and approved by The Hunter New England HREC (HNEHREC Reference No: 16/02/17/3.04). The results of the trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be disseminated via various forms of media. Results will be incorporated in clinical recommendations and practice guidelines produced by professional bodies. REGISTRATION: CROSSFIRE has been registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR: ACTRN12616000969460). |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1228 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016100 |
URL: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541521/ |
PubMed URL: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28645976 |
ISSN: | 2044-6055 |
Journal Title: | BMJ Open |
Type: | Journal Article |
Affiliated Organisations: | Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Sydney, Australia University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Cabrini Institute, Melbourne, Australia The George Institute, Sydney, Australia University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia St George and Sutherland Hospitals, Sydney, Australia Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia Nambour Hospital and Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Nambour, Australia Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, Australia Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Australia Mackay Base Hospital, Mackay, Australia Western Health, Melbourne, Australia Cairns Hospital, Cairns, Australia University Hospital Geelong/Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia Northern Health, Melbourne, Australia St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia Launceston Hospital, Launceston, Australia Gosford and Wyong Hospitals, Gosford, Australia |
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: | Multicentre Studies |
Appears in Collections: | Musculoskeletal |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Harris et al 2017.pdf | 315.88 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.