Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1228
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Martin-
dc.contributor.otherHarris, Ian-
dc.contributor.otherNaylor, Justine-
dc.contributor.otherLawson, Andrew-
dc.contributor.otherBuchbinder, Rachel-
dc.contributor.otherIvers, Rebecca-
dc.contributor.otherBalogh, Zsolt-
dc.contributor.otherSmith, Paul-
dc.contributor.otherMittal, Rajat-
dc.contributor.otherXuan, Wei-
dc.contributor.otherHoward, Kirsten-
dc.contributor.otherVafa, Arezoo-
dc.contributor.otherYates, Piers-
dc.contributor.otherRieger, Bertram-
dc.contributor.otherSmith, Geoff-
dc.contributor.otherElkinson, Ilia-
dc.contributor.otherKim, Woosung-
dc.contributor.otherChehade, Mellick-
dc.contributor.otherSungaran, Jai-
dc.contributor.otherLatendresse, Kim-
dc.contributor.otherWong, James-
dc.contributor.otherViswanathan, Sameer-
dc.contributor.otherShrestha, Kush-
dc.contributor.otherDrobetz, Herwig-
dc.contributor.otherTran, Phong-
dc.contributor.otherLoveridge, Jeremy-
dc.contributor.otherPage, Richard-
dc.contributor.otherHau, Raphael-
dc.contributor.otherBingham, Roger-
dc.contributor.otherMulford, Jonathan-
dc.contributor.otherIncoll, Ian-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-08T02:46:15Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-08T02:46:15Z-
dc.date.issued2017-06-
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e016100en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1228-
dc.description.abstractFractures of the distal radius are common and occur in all age groups. The incidence is high in older populations due to osteoporosis and increased falls risk. Considerable practice variation exists in the management of distal radius fractures in older patients ranging from closed reduction with cast immobilisation to open reduction with plate fixation. Plating is currently the most common surgical treatment. While there is evidence showing no significant advantage for some forms of surgical fixation over conservative treatment, and no difference between different surgical techniques, there is a lack of evidence comparing two of the most common treatments used: closed reduction and casting versus plating. Surgical management involves significant costs and risks compared with conservative management. High-level evidence is required to address practice variation, justify costs and to provide the best clinical outcomes for patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This pragmatic, multicentre randomised comparative effectiveness trial aims to determine whether plating leads to better pain and function and is more cost-effective than closed reduction and casting of displaced distal radius fractures in adults aged 60 years and older. The trial will compare the two techniques but will also follow consenting patients who are unwilling to be randomised in a separate, observational cohort. Inclusion of non-randomised patients addresses selection bias, provides practice and outcome insights about standard care, and improves the generalisability of the results from the randomised trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: CROSSFIRE(Combined Randomised and Observational Study of Surgery for Fractures In the distal Radius in the Elderly) was reviewed and approved by The Hunter New England HREC (HNEHREC Reference No: 16/02/17/3.04). The results of the trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be disseminated via various forms of media. Results will be incorporated in clinical recommendations and practice guidelines produced by professional bodies. REGISTRATION: CROSSFIRE has been registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR: ACTRN12616000969460).en_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishingen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541521/-
dc.subjectOlder Populationen_US
dc.subjectCost-Benefiten_US
dc.subjectFracture Fixationen_US
dc.subjectPatient Reported Outcomeen_US
dc.subjectRadius Fracturesen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectOsteoporosisen_US
dc.subjectFalls Risken_US
dc.subjectTreatment Managementen_US
dc.subjectCast Immobilisationen_US
dc.subjectClosed Reductionen_US
dc.subjectOpen Reductionen_US
dc.subjectPlate Fixationen_US
dc.subjectPlatingen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Treatmentsen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Fixationen_US
dc.subjectConservative Treatmentsen_US
dc.subjectCastingen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Managementen_US
dc.subjectPractice Variationen_US
dc.subjectClinical Outcomesen_US
dc.subjectCost-Effectiveen_US
dc.subjectRisksen_US
dc.subjectDistal Radius Fracturesen_US
dc.subjectStandards of Careen_US
dc.subjectCombined Randomised and Observational Study of Surgery for Fractures In the distal Radius in the Elderlyen_US
dc.subjectCROSSFIREen_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleA combined randomised and observational study of surgery for fractures in the distal radius in the elderly (CROSSFIRE)-a study protocol.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016100en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMJ Openen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28645976en_US
dc.description.affiliatesIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Sydney, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesMonash University, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesCabrini Institute, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesThe George Institute, Sydney, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesJohn Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesCanberra Hospital, Canberra, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesFiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesSt George and Sutherland Hospitals, Sydney, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesWellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealanden_US
dc.description.affiliatesRoyal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesConcord Hospital, Sydney, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesNambour Hospital and Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Nambour, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesWestmead Hospital, Sydney, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesCampbelltown Hospital, Sydney, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDarwin Hospital, Darwin, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesMackay Base Hospital, Mackay, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesWestern Health, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesCairns Hospital, Cairns, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesUniversity Hospital Geelong/Barwon Health, Geelong, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesNorthern Health, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesSt Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesLaunceston Hospital, Launceston, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesGosford and Wyong Hospitals, Gosford, Australiaen_US
dc.type.studyortrialMulticentre Studiesen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
Harris et al 2017.pdf315.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.