Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11434/878
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hamilton, Daniel | - |
dc.contributor.author | McKenzie, Dean | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wasiak, Jason | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fenton, Paul | - |
dc.date | 2015-06 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-11T01:21:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-11-11T01:21:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-12 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice, 14(4), pp. 378–384. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1460-3969 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1467-1131 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11434/878 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The use of bowel preparation strategies to reduce the degree of rectal distension during prostate radiotherapy is well documented. This retrospective pilot study analysed and compared a probiotic agent against a psyllium-supplemented diet to establish the feasibility of probiotics as a bowel preparation for patients receiving radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer. A retrospective chart review of five patients taking probiotics and five taking psyllium husk (psyllium) during their course of radiotherapy treatment was conducted. On treatment, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were compared with planning CTs to quantify inter-fractional variation in rectal volume and distension. Forty-five CBCT scans were available in both the psyllium and probiotics groups for analysis. Variation in mean difference in rectal volume from planning (ΔRV), mean rectal cross-section area (CSA) and mean relative cross-section area (CSArel) was significantly increased for the probiotics group compared with the psyllium group (p=0·001, 0·008 and 0·007, respectively). No statistically significant differences in mean ΔRV, CSA and CSArel were detected between the two groups. This retrospective analysis suggests that a probiotics-based bowel preparation that utilises Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis may result in increased rectal volume and CSA variation throughout treatment in comparison with a psyllium-supplemented diet. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | en_US |
dc.subject | Prostate Cancer | en_US |
dc.subject | Prostate Radiotherapy | en_US |
dc.subject | Rectal Distension | en_US |
dc.subject | Bowel Preparation Strategies | en_US |
dc.subject | Probiotics | en_US |
dc.subject | Psyllium Husk | en_US |
dc.subject | Cone Beam Computed Tomography | en_US |
dc.subject | CBCT | en_US |
dc.subject | Clinical Trials and Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia | en_US |
dc.subject | Epworth Radiation Oncology, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia | en_US |
dc.subject | Epworth Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Victoria, Australia | - |
dc.title | The use of probiotics versus psyllium husk as a bowel preparation for prostate radiotherapy: a retrospective analysis. | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S1460396915000254 | en_US |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice | en_US |
dc.description.affiliates | School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia | en_US |
dc.type.studyortrial | Retrospective studies | en_US |
dc.type.contenttype | Text | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Cancer Services Epworth Prostate Centre Radiation Oncology UroRenal, Vascular |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.