Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/683
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKnox, David-
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Minoo-
dc.contributor.otherRawlings, Mathew-
dc.contributor.otherAckland, David-
dc.date2016-02-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-27T05:00:07Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-27T05:00:07Z-
dc.date.issued2016-04-
dc.identifier.citationInjury. 2016 Apr;47(4):893-8.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0020-1383en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/683-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the strength characteristics of a hybrid uni-cortical construct for clavicle fixation. The technique reported aims to combine benefits of uni-cortical fixation with stability comparable to traditional bi-cortical fixation. The approach utilises long, oblique uni-cortical screws at the distal ends of the plate acting as surrogate bi-cortical screws. Locked uni-cortical screws positioned centrally provide bending and torsion strength to the construct. This alternative hybrid uni-cortical technique does not require far cortex screw or drill penetration required in bi-cortical fixation techniques, thus avoiding potentially catastrophic vascular and or neurologic injury. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical behaviour of the hybrid uni-cortical construct to standard bi-cortical fixations under both torsion and bending loads. METHOD: Thirty osteotomized human cadaveric clavicles were randomly allocated to three surgical fixation techniques: bi-cortical locked screw fixation, bi-cortical non-locked screw fixation and hybrid uni-cortical screw fixation. Each clavicle construct was tested non-destructively under torsional loading, and then under cantilever bending to failure. Construct bending and torsional stiffness, as well as ultimate failure strength, were measured. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between uni-cortical or bi-cortical fixation constructs in either bending stiffness or ultimate bending moment (p>0.05); however, there was a trend towards greater bending stiffness in the hybrid construct. The uni-cortical hybrid fixation technique displayed a significantly lower mean torsional stiffness value when compared with the bi-cortical locked screw fixation (mean difference: 134.4Nmm/degrees, 95% confidence interval [32.3, 236.4], p=0.007). CONCLUSION: A hybrid uni-cortical approach to clavicle plate fixation that may improve screw purchase and reduce risk of intra-operative vascular damage demonstrates comparable bending strength to current bi-cortical approaches.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectStrengthen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectVascular Injuriesen_US
dc.subjectClavicleen_US
dc.subjectFracture Fixationen_US
dc.subjectOrthopaedic Fixation Devicesen_US
dc.subjectHybrid Unicortical Constructen_US
dc.subjectBone Screwsen_US
dc.subjectLocking Screwsen_US
dc.subjectCentre for Limb Reconstruction, The Epworth Centre, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.subjectDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.subject​Musculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.titleA hybrid approach to mid-shaft clavicle fixation.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.042en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleInjuryen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26944179en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Surgery, Southern Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialComparative Studyen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.