Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/591
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Martin-
dc.contributor.otherBlum, Martin-
dc.contributor.otherEsser, Max-
dc.contributor.otherEldho, Paul-
dc.contributor.otherRosenfeldt, Franklin-
dc.date2012-
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-15T06:44:47Z-
dc.date.available2016-04-15T06:44:47Z-
dc.date.issued2012-09-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2012 Sep;26(9):499-505.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0890-5339en_US
dc.identifier.issn1531-2291en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/591-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on deep infection rate in open tibial fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. Data was collected from medical records and radiographs. SETTING: Two level-1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients who sustained an open tibial fracture which underwent delayed soft tissue coverage between January 2002 and December 2007 were included. Exclusion criteria included open fractures receiving a combination of NPWT and conventional dressings, fractures which were treated with a primary amputation, and fractures associated with mortality. INTERVENTION: NPWT with reticulated open cell foam or conventional dressings at surgeon's discretion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Deep infection rate. RESULTS: A total of 229 open tibial fractures in 220 patients met the inclusion criteria and received either NPWT (166/229-72%) or conventional dressings (63/229-28%). There was a decreased rate of deep infection in the NPWT group compared with the conventional dressing group [8.4% (14/166) vs. 20.6% (13/63); P = 0.01]. Univariate predictors of deep infection included Gustilo type {odds ratio (OR): 3.13 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.74-5.64]; P < 0.001} and use of NPWT [OR: 0.35 (95% CI: 0.16-0.80); P = 0.01]. When adjustment was performed for Gustilo type with multivariate analysis, use of NPWT was found to reduce the risk of deep infection by almost 80% [OR: 0.22 (95% CI: 0.09-0.55); P = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that NPWT reduces the rate of deep infection when used for the dressing of traumatic wounds in open tibial fractures.en_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluweren_US
dc.subjectDressingsen_US
dc.subjectDeep Infection Rateen_US
dc.subjectTibial Fracturesen_US
dc.subjectFractures, Openen_US
dc.subjectOpen Tibial Fracturesen_US
dc.subjectNPWTen_US
dc.subjectNegative-Pressure Wound Therapyen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Wound Infectionen_US
dc.subjectTibial Fracturesen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectWounds and Injuriesen_US
dc.subjectTherapyen_US
dc.subjectTreatmenten_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleNegative pressure wound therapy reduces deep infection rate in open tibial fractures.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/BOT.0b013e31824133e3en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Orthopaedic Traumaen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22487900en_US
dc.description.affiliatesFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialRetrospective studiesen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.