Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/461
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Steiger, Richard-
dc.contributor.otherBucknill, Andrew-
dc.contributor.otherYew, Jielin-
dc.contributor.otherClifford, J.-
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-11T06:02:11Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-11T06:02:11Z-
dc.date.issued2012-05-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume 94.SUPP XXIII (2012): 196-196.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0301-620Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-5377en_US
dc.description.abstractPercutaneous cannulated screw placement (PCSP) is a common method of fixation. In pelvic trauma neurovascular structures are in close proximity to the screw path. Pre-operative planning is needed to prevent injury. This study aims to the safety margin and accuracy of screw placement with computer navigation (CAS). A control had no pathology in the pelvis but CT scans were performed for suspected trauma. The treated group had pelvic and acetabular fractures and were treated with CAS PCSP at our institution. Using a new technique involving CT 3D modelling of the whole (3D) safe corridor, the dimensions of the Posterior elements (PE) of the pelvic ring and the anterior column of the acetabulum (AC) were measured in the control group. The accuracy of screw placement (deviation between the actual screw and planned screw) was measured in treated patient using a screenshot method and post-operative CTs. There were 22 control patients and 30 treated patients (40 screws). The mean ± (standard deviation, SD) minimum measurement of the safe corridor at the PE was 15.6 ± 2.3 mm (range 11.6 mm to 20.2 mm) and at the AC was 5.9 ±1.6 mm (range 3.0 mm to 10.0 mm). The mean ± (SD) accuracy of screw placement was 6.1 ± 5.3 mm and ranged from a displacement of 1.3 mm to 16.1 mm. There was a notable correlation between Body Mass Index, duration of surgery and inaccuracy of screw placement in some patients. The largest inaccuracy of screw placement was due to reduction of the fracture during screw insertion, causing movement of the bone fragments relative to the array and therefore also the computerised screw plan. There were no screw breakages, non-unions, neurological or vascular complications. CAS PCSP is a safe and accurate technique. However, the safe corridor is variable and often very narrow. We recommend that the dimensions of the safe corridor be assessed pre-operatively in every patient using 3D modelling to determine the number and size of screw that can be safely placed.en_US
dc.publisherBritish Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectPercutaneous Pelvic Screw Placementen_US
dc.subjectPercutaneous Cannulated Screw Placementen_US
dc.subjectComputer Navigationen_US
dc.subjectCommon Method Of Fixationen_US
dc.subjectPreoperative Planningen_US
dc.subjectInjury Preventionen_US
dc.subjectPCSPen_US
dc.subjectCASen_US
dc.subjectNeurovascular Structuresen_US
dc.subjectScrew Placementen_US
dc.subjectPelvic Traumaen_US
dc.subjectAcetabular Traumaen_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titlePercutaneous pelvic screw placement in pelvic trauma using computer navigation.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Br.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialCase Control Studiesen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.