Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/450
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCraven, Robyn-
dc.contributor.otherBolton, Karen-
dc.contributor.otherEgerton, Thorlene-
dc.contributor.otherWark, John-
dc.contributor.otherWee, Elin-
dc.contributor.otherMatthews, Bernadette-
dc.contributor.otherKelly, Anne-
dc.contributor.otherKantor, Sue-
dc.contributor.otherBennell, Kim-
dc.date2011-10-
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-11T01:14:52Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-11T01:14:52Z-
dc.date.issued2012-03-
dc.identifier.citationJ Sci Med Sport. 2012 Mar;15(2):102-9en_US
dc.identifier.issn1440-2440en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/450-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of an exercise program for post-menopausal women with osteopenia undertaken in community exercise facilities. DESIGN: Randomised, single-blind controlled trial. METHODS: Thirty-nine community volunteers with hip osteopenia and not taking bone-enhancing medication were randomly allocated to an exercise (EX) or control (CON) group. EX participants attended an exercise facility in Melbourne, Australia, three times/week for 52 weeks (with a 2 week break) for partially supervised exercises targeting hip bone strength, muscle strength and balance. They also performed daily jumping exercises at home. CON participants continued with their usual care. All participants were given calcium supplementation. Assessment at baseline and 52 weeks measured bone mineral density (BMD) at the proximal femur and lumbar spine. Health-related quality of life (QOL) and objective measures of strength and balance were also collected. RESULTS: ANCOVA adjusting for baseline values revealed a small benefit of exercise in mean total hip BMD (the primary outcome) with a significant mean difference in change between groups of -0.012 g/cm(2) (95% CI -0.022 to -0.002 g/cm(2)). EX participants improved 0.5% compared with a 0.9% loss for CON participants. The only other between-group differences were in QOL and a test of trunk and upper limb endurance, which both favoured the EX group. CONCLUSIONS: This exercise program appears to have modest benefits for post-menopausal women with osteopenia who are not taking bone-enhancing medication. This mode of exercise delivery has adherence and progression limitations but may be appropriate to recommend for some people.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectBone Densityen_US
dc.subjectPost Menopausal Womenen_US
dc.subjectOsteopeniaen_US
dc.subjectAccidential Fallsen_US
dc.subjectExercise Therapyen_US
dc.subjectFemuren_US
dc.subjectMuscle Strengthen_US
dc.subjectPhysiologyen_US
dc.subjectOsteoporosisen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectEpworth Freemasons Women's Health and Breast Clinic, Australiaen_US
dc.subjectBMDen_US
dc.subjectHip Bone Strengthen_US
dc.subjectBalanceen_US
dc.subjectCalcium Supplementsen_US
dc.subjectQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.subjectQOLen_US
dc.titleEffects of exercise on bone density and falls risk factors in post-menopausal women with osteopenia: A randomised controlled trialen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jsams.2011.08.007en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Science and Medicine in Sporten_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21996058en_US
dc.description.affiliatesThe University of Melbourne, Department of Physiotherapy, Australiaen_US
dc.type.studyortrialRandomized Controlled Clinical Trial/Controlled Clinical Trialen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.