Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/385
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Minoo-
dc.contributor.authorKnox, David-
dc.contributor.otherAckland, David-
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-17T06:14:50Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-17T06:14:50Z-
dc.date.issued2015-07-
dc.identifier.citationJ Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Jul 2;10:101.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1749-799Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/385-
dc.description.abstractThe management of irreparable rotator cuff tears associated with osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint has long been challenging. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was designed to provide pain relief and improve shoulder function in patients with severe rotator cuff tear arthropathy. While this procedure has been known to reduce pain, improve strength and increase range of motion in shoulder elevation, scapular notching, rotation deficiency, early implant loosening and dislocation have attributed to complication rates as high as 62 %. Patient selection, surgical approach and post-operative management are factors vital to successful outcome of RSA, with implant design and component positioning having a significant influence on the ability of the shoulder muscles to elevate, axially rotate and stabilise the humerus. Clinical and biomechanical studies have revealed that component design and placement affects the location of the joint centre of rotation and therefore the force-generating capacity of the muscles and overall joint mobility and stability. Furthermore, surgical technique has also been shown to have an important influence on clinical outcome of RSA, as it can affect intra-operative joint exposure as well as post-operative muscle function. This review discusses the behaviour of the shoulder after RSA and the influence of implant design, component positioning and surgical technique on post-operative joint function and clinical outcome.en_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.subjectRotator Cuff Tearsen_US
dc.subjectOsteoarthritisen_US
dc.subjectGlenohumeral Jointen_US
dc.subjectReverse Total Shoulder Arthroplastyen_US
dc.subjectRSAen_US
dc.subjectShoulder Functionen_US
dc.subjectShoulder Painen_US
dc.subjectStrengthen_US
dc.subjectRange of Motionen_US
dc.subjectShoulder Elevationen_US
dc.subjectProsthesisen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectDeltoiden_US
dc.subjectComplicationsen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Techniqueen_US
dc.subjectIntra-Operative Joint Exposureen_US
dc.subjectPost-Operative Muscle Functionen_US
dc.subjectImplant Designen_US
dc.subjectComponent Positioningen_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia-
dc.subjectOrthopaedic Surgery, Epworth Healthcare, Victoria, Australia-
dc.titleProsthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13018-015-0244-2.en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Researchen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26135298en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.type.studyortrialReviewen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Annual Reports
Musculoskeletal

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.pdf1.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.