Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/369
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Declan-
dc.contributor.otherSundaram, Chandru-
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-16T06:06:42Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-16T06:06:42Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-
dc.identifier.citation2013 Oct;112(6):713-4en_US
dc.identifier.issn1464-410Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/369-
dc.description.abstractComment on BJU Int. 2013 Oct;112(6):864-71en_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectTrainingen_US
dc.subjectTraining on Animalsen_US
dc.subjectIn Vivo Trainingen_US
dc.subjectInanimate Trainingen_US
dc.subjectSimulator Trainingen_US
dc.subjectRobotic Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectUrological Surgical Proceduresen_US
dc.subjectAustralian Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Richmond Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.en_US
dc.titleComparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11760.xen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleBJU Internationalen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24028763en_US
dc.description.affiliatesPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Division of Cancer Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USAen_US
dc.type.studyortrialComparative Assessment-
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Epworth Prostate Centre
UroRenal, Vascular

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
Murphy_et_al-2013-BJU_International.pdf54.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.