Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2426
Title: Predictors of improved attentional control after virtual reality-based cognitive rehabilitation in chronic traumatic brain injury.
Epworth Authors: Ponsford, Jennie
Other Authors: Johansen, Truls
Matre, Martin
Løvstad, Marianne
Olsen, Alexander
Lund, Anne
Martinsen, Anne-Catrine Trægde
Becker, Frank
Brunborg, Cathrine
Tornås, Sveinung
Keywords: Virtual Reality
VR
Traumatic Brain Injury
TBI
Attentional Control
Rehabilitation
Cognitive Interventions
Cognitive Training
Cognitive Impairments
Epworth‐Monash Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Monash Medical School, Monash University, Parkville, Australia
Rehabilitation, Mental Health and Chronic Pain Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: Apr-2026
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Citation: Disability & Rehabilitation Published Online 29 April 2026
Abstract: The purpose of this paper was to explore predictors of change in attentional control observed in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating VR-based cognitive training, using the game BeatSaber. Materials and methods: Data were collected at baseline of the RCT, including 100 participants in the chronic phase of TBI, defined as at least one year post-injury. The 51 participants randomized to the VR group were included in this analysis. Primary outcome measure was based on the main significant finding from the RCT, a ratio score between speed and accuracy, Inverse Efficiency Score (IES). To explore potential predictors of post-treatment change in IES, a multivariable regression analysis was performed. Based on previous research, age, years since injury, executive functioning, level of abstract thinking, and immersive tendencies were selected as predictors. Results: The model explained 40% of the variance of the post treatment change in IES. More years since injury, lower baseline executive functioning and higher immersive tendencies towards games explained greater change in VR-training. However, after bootstrapping, only years since injury remained a significant predictor. Conclusion: In light of the bootstrapped analyses, the findings should be interpreted as exploratory and considered hypothesis-generating, warranting further investigation in larger samples.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2426
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2663968
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42053561/
ISSN: 0963-8288
1464-5165
Journal Title: Disability & Rehabilitation
Type: Journal Article
Affiliated Organisations: Center for Research and Education, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesodden, Norway
Department of Occupational Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
Clinic of Rehabilitation, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway
Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Oslo Centre for Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
The Norwegian Directorate of Health, Department of Innovation, Oslo, Norway
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Appears in Collections:Neurosciences
Rehabilitation

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.