Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/229
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Steiger, Richarden
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Martinen
dc.contributor.otherTay, W.en
dc.contributor.otherGruen, Russellen
dc.contributor.otherBalogh, Zsolten
dc.date2014-10en
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-11T00:56:01Zen
dc.date.available2015-06-11T00:56:01Zen
dc.date.issued2014-10en
dc.identifier.citationInjury 2014 Oct;45(10):1653-8en
dc.identifier.issn0020-1383en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/229en
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Knowledge about the functional consequences of lower limb long bone fractures is helpful to inform patients, clinicians and employers about their recovery process and prognosis. This study aims to describe the epidemiology and health outcomes of femoral and tibial shaft fractures treated at two level I trauma centres, by comparing the differences between patients with delayed union or nonunion and patients with union. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An analysis of registry data over two years, supplemented with medical record review, was conducted. Fracture healing was retrospectively assessed by clinical and radiological evidence of union, and the need for surgical intervention. SF-12 scores, and work and pain status were prospectively recorded at six and twelve months post injury. RESULTS: 285 fractures progressed to union and 138 fractures developed delayed union or nonunion. There was a significant difference between the two cohorts with regards to the mechanism of injury, association with multi-trauma, open fractures, grade of Gustilo classification, patient fund source, smoking status and presence of comorbidities. The SF-12 physical component score was less than 50 at both six and twelve months with improvement in the union group, but not in the delayed union or nonunion group. 72% of patients with union had returned to work at one year, but 54% continued to have pain. The difference compared to patients with delayed union or nonunion was significant. DISCUSSION: Even patients whose fractures unite in the expectant time-frame will have residual physical disability. Patients with delayed union or nonunion have still poorer outcomes, including ongoing problems with returning to work and pain. It is important to educate patients about their injury so that they have realistic expectations. This is particularly relevant given that the patients most likely to sustain femoral or tibial shaft fractures are working-age healthy adults, and up to a third of fractures may develop delayed union or nonunion. CONCLUSION: Despite modern treatment, the patient-reported outcomes of lower limb long bone shaft fractures do not return to normal at one year. Patients with delayed union or nonunion can expect poorer outcomes.en
dc.subjectTibial Fracturesen
dc.subjectFemoral Fracturesen
dc.subjectFractures, Ununiteden
dc.subjectLower Limb - injuriesen
dc.subjectBone Fracturesen
dc.subjectFractures, Boneen
dc.subjectTraumaen
dc.subjectOrthopaedicsen
dc.subjectDelayed Unionen
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia-
dc.titleHealth outcomes of delayed union and nonunion of femoral and tibial shaft fractures.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.injury.2014.06.025en
dc.identifier.journaltitleInjuryen
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25062602en
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, New South Wales, Australiaen
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Surgery, National Trauma Research Institute, The Alfred, Monash University, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australiaen
dc.description.affiliatesSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australiaen
dc.type.studyortrialMulticentre Studiesen
dc.type.contenttypeTexten
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.