Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2091
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Steiger, Richard-
dc.contributor.otherHarris, Ian-
dc.contributor.otherKirwan, David-
dc.contributor.otherPeng, Yi-
dc.contributor.otherLewis, Peter-
dc.contributor.otherGraves, Stephen-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-20T04:30:41Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-20T04:30:41Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open . 2022 May 31;12(5):e055859.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/2091-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aims to compare early mortality after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using conventional intramedullary instrumentation to TKA performed using technology-assisted (non-intramedullary) instrumentation. Design: Comparative observational study. Using data from a large national registry, the 30-day mortality after unilateral TKA performed for osteoarthritis was compared between procedures using conventional instrumentation and those using technology-assisted instrumentation. Firth logistic regression was used to calculate ORs, adjusting for age, sex, use of cement and procedure year for the whole period, and additionally adjusting for American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system class and body mass index (BMI) for the period 2015 to 2019. This analysis was repeated for 7-day and 90-day mortality. Setting: National arthroplasty registry. Participants: People undergoing unilateral, elective TKA for osteoarthritis from 2003 to 2019 inclusive. Interventions: TKA performed using conventional intramedullary instrumentation or technology-assisted instrumentation. Main outcome measures: 30-day mortality (primary), and 7-day and 90-day mortality. Results: A total of 581 818 unilateral TKA procedures performed for osteoarthritis were included, of which 602 (0.10%) died within 30 days of surgery. The OR of death within 30 days following TKA performed with conventional instrumentation compared with technology-assisted instrumentation, adjusted for age, sex, cement use, procedure year, American Society of Anesthesiologists and BMI was 1.72 (95% CI, 1.23 to 2.41, p=0.001). The corresponding ORs for 7-day and 90-day mortality were 2.21 (96% CI, 1.34 to 3.66, p=0.002) and 1.35 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.69, p=0.010), respectively. Conclusions: The use of conventional instrumentation during TKA is associated with higher odds of early postoperative death than when technology-assisted instrumentation is used. This difference may be explained by complications related to fat embolism secondary to intramedullary rods used in conventional instrumentation. Given the high number of TKA performed annually worldwide, increasing the use of technology-assisted instrumentation may reduce early post-operative mortalityen_US
dc.publisherBMJen_US
dc.subjectTotal Knee Arthoplastyen_US
dc.subjectTKAen_US
dc.subjectConventional Intramedullary Instrumentationen_US
dc.subjectTechnology-Assisted (Non-Intramedullary) Instrumentationen_US
dc.subjectNational Arthroplasty Registryen_US
dc.subjectOsteoarthritisen_US
dc.subject30 Day Mortalityen_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleIncreased early mortality after total knee arthroplasty using conventional instrumentation compared with technology-assisted surgery: an analysis of linked national registry data.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055859en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMJ Openen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35641007/en_US
dc.description.affiliatesSchool of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesWhitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesInsight Private Hospital, Albury, New South Wales, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialComparative Studyen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
r de s.pdf325.07 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.