Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1717
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Steiger, Richard-
dc.contributor.otherReynolds, J.-
dc.contributor.otherRedley, Bernice-
dc.contributor.otherLivingston, P. M.-
dc.contributor.otherHutchinson, Ana-
dc.contributor.otherBotti, Mari-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T02:19:52Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-23T02:19:52Z-
dc.date.issued2019-04-
dc.identifier.citation(2019). Patient activation intervention to facilitate participation in recovery after total knee replacement (MIME): a cluster randomised cross-over trial. BMJ Qual Saf, 28:782-792.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-5423en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1717-
dc.descriptionOpen Access Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractPatient participation in care is a fundamental element of safe and high-quality healthcare with the potential to enhance health outcomes and improve patient satisfaction. To test the efficacy of a clinician-facilitated, bedside multimedia (MyStay) intervention designed to support patient participation in their recovery after total knee replacement surgery. The primary outcome was patients' reported worst pain intensity on postoperative day 3. Secondary outcomes were patient activation, length of hospital stay, knee function and satisfaction with care. Unmasked, cluster randomised, four-period cross-over trial with a simultaneous process evaluation within in a large private, not-for-profit, metropolitan teaching hospital. Statistical analyses used linear mixed models with random effects for wards, cohorts within wards and patients within cohorts and fixed effects for treatment and period. 241 patients were recruited between March 2014 and June 2015. Patients were admitted to intervention (104) or control (137) clusters. Intervention group patients reported significantly lower mean pain intensity scores on postoperative day 3 (6.1 vs 7.1, 95% CI -1.94 to -0.08, p=0.04). The percentages of patients who reported severe pain (score ≥7) were 43.7% and 64.2% in the intervention and control groups, respectively (χ2 9.89, p=0.002; generalised linear mixed model Wald test, p=0.05). Intervention group patients on average stayed in hospital one less day (5.3 vs 6.3, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.94, p=0.04), reported higher activation (45.1% vs 27.1% at level 4 activation) (p=0.04) and higher overall satisfaction with care (9.3 vs 8.6, 95% CI 1.09 to 0.219, p=0.01), and were more likely to refer family or friends to the health service (9.3 vs 8.7, 95% CI 1.07 to 0.13, p=0.02).en_US
dc.publisher2019 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & the Health Foundationen_US
dc.subjectBedside Multimedia Interventionen_US
dc.subjectMyStayen_US
dc.subjectClinician-Facilitated Multimediaen_US
dc.subjectMIMEen_US
dc.subjectHigh-Quality Healthcareen_US
dc.subjectOutcomesen_US
dc.subjectHealth Services Researchen_US
dc.subjectInformation Technologyen_US
dc.subjectITen_US
dc.subjectPatient-Centred Careen_US
dc.subjectCluster Trialsen_US
dc.subjectUnmasked Cluster Randomisationen_US
dc.subjectCross-Over Trialen_US
dc.subjectSimultaneous Process Evaluationen_US
dc.subjectStatistical Analysisen_US
dc.subjectTotal Knee Replacement Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectTotal Knee Replacementen_US
dc.subjectTKRen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectNumerical Rating Scaleen_US
dc.subjectNRSen_US
dc.subjectAmerican Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaireen_US
dc.subjectAPSOQ-Ren_US
dc.subjectPain Managementen_US
dc.subjectOxford Knee Scoreen_US
dc.subjectOKSen_US
dc.subjectDepartment of Surgery, Epworth Healthcareen_US
dc.subjectCentre for Quality and Safety Research, Epworth Partnership, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.subjectEpworth HealthCare, Vic, Australiaen_US
dc.titlePatient activation intervention to facilitate participation in recovery after total knee replacement (MIME): a cluster randomised cross-over trial.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008975en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMJ Quality & Safetyen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30975730en_US
dc.description.affiliatesFaculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Safety Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesFaculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesFaculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesFaculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Safety Research, Epworth Partnership, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.type.studyortrialCluster Randomised Cross-Over Trialen_US
dc.type.studyortrialLinear Mixed Modelsen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Health Informatics
Musculoskeletal

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
PatientActivationInterventionToRecovery_April2019_BMJ.pdf2.8 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.