Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2178
Title: Responsiveness of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set V2.0: An international longitudinal study.
Epworth Authors: New, Peter
Other Authors: Post, Marcel
Forchheimer, Martin
Charlifue, Susan
D'Andrea Greve, Julia
Tate, Denise
Keywords: QoL-BDS V2.0
International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set V2.0
Spinal Cord Injury
SCI
Spinal Cord Disease
SCD
Spinal Cord Rehabilitation
Spinal Cord
SCI-SCS
Adaptation
Quality Of Life
Rehabilitation
Validation Studies
Epworth-Monash Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Neurosciences Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: May-2023
Publisher: American Paraplegia Society
Citation: J Spinal Cord Med . 2023 May 3;1-9
Abstract: Context/objective: Examine the sensitivity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set V2.0 (QoL-BDS V2.0) to reflect changes in mobility and secondary health conditions (SHCs) between inpatient rehabilitation and one-year follow-up. Design: International longitudinal study. Questionnaires were administered at baseline (Median 6 weeks, inter-quartile range 4-10 weeks post-onset) and after 12 months. Setting: Spinal cord rehabilitation institutions in the US, Brazil, Australia and the Netherlands. Participants: : Individuals with recent onset of spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/SCD) admitted to inpatient rehabilitation. Outcome measures: The QoL-BDS V2.0, comprises four items on satisfaction with 'life as a whole', 'physical health', 'psychological health', and 'social life'. Mobility level was measured with a single item and SHCs with the SCI Secondary Conditions Scale (SCI-SCS). Results: Of the 160 participants, 61% had SCI, 48% had tetraplegia and 82% were wheelchair-users. Scores on 'life as a whole', 'physical health' and the total scale were significantly higher at follow-up compared to baseline in the total sample and the SCD subgroup, but not in the SCI subgroup. Increases in 'physical health', 'psychological health', 'social life' and the total score were significantly associated with improvements in the SCI-SCS or mobility scores. Participants with improved SCI-SCS and mobility at follow-up showed significantly more improvement in satisfaction with social life and the total score compared to participants without such favorable changes. Conclusion: The results of this study provide partial evidence of responsiveness of the QoL-BDS V2.0 total score as a measure of QoL among individuals with SCI/SCD.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2178
DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2197820
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37133305/
ISSN: 1079-0268
2045-7723
Journal Title: The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Type: Journal Article
Affiliated Organisations: Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Groningen, the Netherlands
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colorado, USA
Orthopedic Department Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazi
Spinal Rehabilitation Service, Caulfield Hospital, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Longitudinal
Appears in Collections:Neurosciences
Rehabilitation

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.