Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/65
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPonsford, Jennieen
dc.contributor.otherBragge, Peteren
dc.contributor.otherMarshall, Shawnen
dc.contributor.otherPiccenna, Lorettaen
dc.contributor.otherTate, Robynen
dc.contributor.otherWiseman-Hakes, Catherineen
dc.contributor.otherVelikonja, Dianaen
dc.contributor.otherPuttuwage, Loyalen
dc.contributor.otherPitt, Veronicaen
dc.contributor.otherStergiou-Kita, Maryen
dc.contributor.otherTeasell, Roberten
dc.contributor.otherBayley, Marken
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-04T04:57:18Zen
dc.date.available2014-09-04T04:57:18Zen
dc.date.issued2014-07en
dc.identifier.citationJ Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014 Jul-Aug;29(4):277-89en
dc.identifier.issn0885-9701en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/65en
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury can aid in optimizing function, independence, and quality of life by addressing impairments in attention, executive function, cognitive communication, and memory. This study aimed to identify and evaluate the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines for cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury. Methods: Systematic searching of databases and Web sites was undertaken between January and March 2012 to identify freely available, English language clinical practice guidelines from 2002 onward. Eligible guidelines were evaluated using the validated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. Results: The 11 guidelines that met inclusion criteria were independently rated by 4 raters. Results of quality appraisal indicated that guidelines generally employed systematic search and appraisal methods and produced unambiguous, clearly identifiable recommendations. Conversely, only 1 guideline incorporated implementation and audit information, and there was poor reporting of processes for formulating, reviewing, and ensuring currency of recommendations and incorporating patient preferences. Intraclass correlation coefficients for agreement between raters showed high agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.80) for all guidelines except for 1 (moderate agreement; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.76). Conclusion: Future guidelines should address identified limitations by providing implementation information and audit criteria, along with better reporting of guideline development processes and stakeholder engagement.en
dc.subjectClinical Practice Guidelinesen
dc.subjectTraumatic Brain Injuryen
dc.subjectCognitive Rehabilitationen
dc.subjectTBIen
dc.subjectMonash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.-
dc.titleQuality of guidelines for cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injuryen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/HTR.0000000000000066en
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitationen
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24984092en
dc.description.affiliatesMonash Universityen
dc.description.affiliatesThe Alfred Hospitalen
dc.description.affiliatesThe Ottawa Hospital Rehabilitation Center, University of Ottawaen
dc.description.affiliatesUHN-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Division of Physiatry, Department of Medicine, University of Torontoen
dc.description.affiliatesRehabilitation Studies Unit, Sydney Medical School - Northern, The University of Sydneyen
dc.description.affiliatesLawson Research Institute and Western University, London, Ontarioen
dc.description.affiliatesBloorview Research Institute, Hollanden
dc.description.affiliatesBloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontarioen
dc.description.affiliatesToronto Rehabilitation Instituteen
dc.description.affiliatesAcquired Brain Injury Program, Hamilton Health Sciences, DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontarioen
dc.type.studyortrialReviewen
Appears in Collections:Neurosciences
Rehabilitation

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.