Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Michael-
dc.contributor.otherKevat, Dev-
dc.contributor.otherLoff, Bebe-
dc.identifier.citationMedical Journal of Australia 2011 Oct 17;195(8):442-5.en_US
dc.description.abstractClinical guidelines are being increasingly produced to improve quality of care, but are vulnerable to bias. • Only 15% of guidelines on the National Health and Medical Research Council portal from the most prolific developers have published conflict of interest statements, and fewer detail the processes used to manage conflicts. • Comprehensive disclosure of conflicts is needed to safeguard the integrity of clinical guidelines and the medical profession. • Peak bodies and clinicians should seek to promote an improvement to current poor practice.en_US
dc.publisherAustralasian Medical Publishing Companyen_US
dc.subjectConflict of Interesten_US
dc.subjectQuality of Health Careen_US
dc.subjectMedical Professionalismen_US
dc.subjectNational Health and Medical Researchen_US
dc.subjectEpworth Cardiac Clinical Instituteen_US
dc.titleConflict of interest guidelines for clinical guidelines.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleMedical Journal of Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesRoyal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queenslanden_US
Appears in Collections:Health Administration

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.