Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/368
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Gavin-
dc.contributor.otherSchache, Anthony-
dc.date2010-
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-11T05:21:46Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-11T05:21:46Z-
dc.date.issued2010-05-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2010; 25(3):164-172.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0885-9701en_US
dc.identifier.issn1550-509Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/368-
dc.description.abstractTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is the primary cause of death and disability for 18- to 45-year-olds. High-level mobility is important for many of the social, leisure, sporting, and employment roles of young adults. The aim of these case reports was to evaluate a conceptual framework for retraining high-level mobility after TBI. The progression of 2 patients who had sustained a severe TBI but had contrasting clinical presentations was monitored over 6 months. Patient 1 presented with left hemiplegia following a TBI 10 years earlier, whereas patient 2 presented with ataxia 2 months following a TBI. Quantitative gait analysis and clinical measures of mobility were used to evaluate outcomes of a 6-month intervention phase. Intervention strategies were based on a conceptual framework comprising 2 main elements: (1) the hierarchical ordering of high-level mobility tasks and (2) the key biomechanical features of able-bodied running. Both patients achieved the ability to run by the end of the intervention phase. Patient 1 displayed improved gait symmetry associated with improved high-level mobility, despite the long-standing duration of his injury. Patient 2 demonstrated improved postural control and stability in gait that resulted in an ability to run, skip, hop, and jump. Findings of these case reports provide evidence supporting "proof of concept" that clinical interventions can lead to improvement in high-level mobility following severe TBI.en_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapy Department, Epworth Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectBrain Injuriesen_US
dc.subjectInjuries, Brainen_US
dc.subjectTBIen_US
dc.subjectTrauma, Brainen_US
dc.subjectTraumatic Brain Injuryen_US
dc.subjectGaiten_US
dc.subjectRunningen_US
dc.subjectRecovery of Functionen_US
dc.subjectDisability Evaluationen_US
dc.subjectStair Navigationen_US
dc.subjectHemiplegiaen_US
dc.subjectKinematicsen_US
dc.subjectMobility Limitationen_US
dc.subjectHigh Level Mobilityen_US
dc.subjectPatient Outcome Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectEducation of Patientsen_US
dc.subjectPostureen_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.subjectCerebrovascular Accidenten_US
dc.subjectVascular Accident, Brainen_US
dc.subjectAtaxiaen_US
dc.subjectAerobic Exerciseen_US
dc.subjectExercise Therapyen_US
dc.subjectNeurologic Deficitsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of a conceptual framework for retraining high-level mobility following traumatic brain injury: two case reportsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181dc120ben_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitationen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20473090en_US
dc.description.affiliatesCentre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, School of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.type.studyortrialEvaluation Studyen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Neurosciences
Rehabilitation

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.