Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11434/322
Title: | Stacked abdominal flap for unilateral breast reconstruction |
Epworth Authors: | Wasiak, Jason |
Other Authors: | Murray, Alexandra Rozen, Warren Matthew Ferris, Scott Grinsell, Damien |
Keywords: | Unilateral Breast Reconstruction DIEP Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Plastic Surgery Burns Mammaplasty Surgery, Plastic Burns-Therapy Abdominal Flap Single Pedicle Flap Stacked Double Pedicle Flap Stacked Abdominal Flap Deep Inferior Epigastric Superficial Inferior Epigastric Epworth Radiation Oncology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia |
Issue Date: | Mar-2015 |
Publisher: | Thieme |
Citation: | J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015 Mar;31(3):179-86 |
Abstract: | BACKGROUND: The abdominal flap can be used in a stacked, double-pedicle configuration for unilateral breast reconstruction. Aided by preoperative mapping, this is a good option when a single-pedicle flap is deemed unsuitable. We present reliable outcomes using the stacked flap and a logical classification system for its use. METHODS: From 2008 to 2013, 18 patients underwent a stacked abdominal flap for unilateral breast reconstruction. Flaps utilized deep inferior epigastric (D) and superficial inferior epigastric (S) pedicle combinations. Preoperative computed tomography angiogram was performed on all patients. Medical records were reviewed for complications and clinical data, and a thorough clinical evaluation was performed on all patients at follow-up. Flaps were all double-pedicled, with the secondary pedicle anastomosed onto the primary pedicle (type 1 to 3) or onto a second recipient vessel (type 4). Flaps were then classified into groups, based on pedicle dominance and intraflap anastomosis. RESULTS: Twelve reconstructions were immediate and six delayed. Mean operative time was 7 hours, the most frequently used configuration being a type 1 DD, that is, secondary pedicle (D) anastomosed end-to-end onto the superior continuation of the primary pedicle (D). Average hospital stay was 6 days. There were no flap losses and minimal complications, and mean follow-up was 20 months. CONCLUSION: Use of this flap poses a greater challenge to the microsurgical breast reconstruction. We demonstrate its reliable use in women deemed unsuitable for a single-pedicle flap. Our structured system clarifies vascular options, and preoperative perforator mapping tools are essential to the success of this technique. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11434/322 |
DOI: | 10.1055/s-0034-1390165 |
PubMed URL: | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25259672 |
ISSN: | 0743-684X |
Journal Title: | Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery |
Type: | Journal Article |
Affiliated Organisations: | Plastic Surgery Department, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia Victorian Adult Burns Service and School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University The Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Plastic Surgery Department, St Vincent's Private, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Plastic Surgery Department, Western Hospital, Gordon Street, Footscray, Victoria, Australia |
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: | Retrospective studies |
Appears in Collections: | Radiation Oncology |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.