Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1974
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Neil-
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Paul-
dc.contributor.otherKrepel, Noralie-
dc.contributor.othervan Dijk, Hanneke-
dc.contributor.otherLeuchter, Andrew-
dc.contributor.otherVila-Rodriguez, Fidel-
dc.contributor.otherBlumberger, Daniel-
dc.contributor.otherDownar, Jonathan-
dc.contributor.otherWilson, Andrew-
dc.contributor.otherDaskalakis, Zafiris-
dc.contributor.otherCarpenter, Linda-
dc.contributor.otherCorlier, Juliana-
dc.contributor.otherArns, Martijn-
dc.date2020-11-10-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-09T05:02:44Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-09T05:02:44Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-
dc.identifier.citation2021 132(2):650-659.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1388-2457en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1974-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Our previous research showed high predictive accuracy at differentiating responders from non-responders to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depression using resting electroencephalography (EEG) and clinical data from baseline and one-week following treatment onset using a machine learning algorithm. In particular, theta (4-8 Hz) connectivity and alpha power (8-13 Hz) significantly differed between responders and non-responders. Independent replication is a necessary step before the application of potential predictors in clinical practice. This study attempted to replicate the results in an independent dataset. Methods: We submitted baseline resting EEG data from an independent sample of participants who underwent rTMS treatment for depression (N = 193, 128 responders) (Krepel et al., 2018) to the same between group comparisons as our previous research (Bailey et al., 2019). Results: Our previous results were not replicated, with no difference between responders and non-responders in theta connectivity (p = 0.250, Cohen's d = 0.1786) nor alpha power (p = 0.357, ηp2 = 0.005). Conclusions: These results suggest that baseline resting EEG theta connectivity or alpha power are unlikely to be generalisable predictors of response to rTMS treatment for depression. Significance: These results highlight the importance of independent replication, data sharing and using large datasets in the prediction of response research.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulationen_US
dc.subjectrTMSen_US
dc.subjectDepressionen_US
dc.subjectResting Electroencephalographyen_US
dc.subjectEEGen_US
dc.subjectAlpha Poweren_US
dc.subjectICON-DBen_US
dc.subjectReplicationen_US
dc.subjectTheta Connectivityen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitation, Mental Health and Chronic Pain Clinical Instituteen_US
dc.titleResting EEG theta connectivity and alpha power to predict repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation response in depression: A non-replication from the ICON-DB consortium.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.018en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleClinical Neurophysiologyen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33223495/en_US
dc.description.affiliatesResearch Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesResearch Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Location AMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, the Netherlands.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesTMS Clinical and Research Program, Neuromodulation Division, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Dept. of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesNon-Invasive Neurostimulation Therapies Laboratory, Dpt. Psychiatry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDept. of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDept. of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesButler Hospital Mood Disorders Research Program and Neuromodulation Research Facility, Dept. of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesResearch Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Location AMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, the Netherlands.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialMulticentre Studiesen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Mental Health

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.