Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1921
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNanayakkara, Pavitra-
dc.contributor.otherSenarath, Sachintha-
dc.contributor.otherAdes, Alex-
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-12T04:24:41Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-12T04:24:41Z-
dc.date.issued2020-12-
dc.identifier.citationObstet Gynecol Surv . 2020 Dec;75(12):757-765en_US
dc.identifier.issn0029-7828en_US
dc.identifier.issn1533-9866en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1921-
dc.description.abstractImportance: Cervical insufficiency (CI) is a serious complication of pregnancy, which can cause preterm birth. Identifying how to most effectively treat CI has the potential to maximize neonatal survival in this population of women. Objective: To determine whether transabdominal cervical cerclage should be offered as a first-line treatment option in high-risk women. Evidence acquisition: An electronic literature search for relevant studies was conducted using keywords (CI, cervical cerclage) on the MEDLINE database. Results: Although transabdominal cerclage (TAC) is reserved as a second-line treatment option over transvaginal cerclage (TVC), it has some advantages over TVC: a higher placement of the suture at the level of the cervicoisthmic junction; avoidance of placement of foreign material in the vagina, in turn, reducing risk of infection and inflammation, which can propagate preterm labor; and the option to leave the suture in place for future pregnancies. Systematic review evidence offers TAC as a more effective procedure to TVC in reducing preterm birth and maximizing neonatal survival. Although TAC is a slightly more complex procedure compared with TVC, advances in minimally invasive surgery now allow gynecologists to perform this more effective procedure laparoscopically and therefore without the added morbidity of open surgery but with the same if not better outcomes. Conclusions: Laparoscopic TAC can provide a more effective treatment option for CI without the added burdens of open abdominal surgery. Relevance: Our article highlights future directions for study in the area of cervical cerclage and refinement of existing practices.en_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluweren_US
dc.subjectCervical Insufficiencyen_US
dc.subjectCIen_US
dc.subjectTransabdominal Cerclageen_US
dc.subjectTACen_US
dc.subjectTransvaginal Cerclageen_US
dc.subjectTVCen_US
dc.subjectPregnancyen_US
dc.subjectComplicationsen_US
dc.subjectPreterm Birthen_US
dc.subjectNeonatalen_US
dc.subjectSutureen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopicen_US
dc.subjectWomen's and Children's Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleCervical cerclage: A review and rethinking of current practice.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/OGX.0000000000000847en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleObstetrical & Gynecological Surveyen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33369686/en_US
dc.description.affiliatesFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesRoyal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australiaen_US
dc.type.studyortrialLiterature Reviewen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Women's and Children's

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.