Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1453
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcConchie, Steve-
dc.contributor.authorShuakat, Muhammad Nadeem-
dc.contributor.authorWickramasinghe, Nilmini-
dc.contributor.otherReischl, D.-
dc.contributor.otherEigner, Isabella-
dc.contributor.otherBodendorf, Freimut-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-27T02:41:31Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-27T02:41:31Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1453-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Unplanned hospital readmissions are quality of care indicators and major cost drivers. Australia has one of the highest rates of hysterectomy (27,586 procedures a year) in benign diseases as compared to other OECD countries3. Hence, this study focusses on addressing this issue by setting out to develop a suitable predictive model. Methodology: A double de-identified data set with patient data for 10 years on hysterectomy procedures undertaken at a private not-for profit tertiary healthcare facility is examined. To this data set, processes suggested by Shmueli and Koppius4 are employed to build a suitable prediction model. Discussion: Especially with imbalanced data, novel ensemble approaches promise a better performance in predicting the minority class. These approaches combine resampling techniques with either boosting or bagging. The most promising ensembles being RUSBoost or underbagging. To have a comprehensive benchmark also SMOTEBoost and Overbagging are added to determine the best performing approach in predicting unplanned hysterectomy readmissions. Since all ensemble methods need base classifiers, this study compares how decision tree (DT), artificial neural net (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers perform in combination with these novel ensemble methods and their components. To identify the best model, the AUC-Score is used as performance measure. Conclusion: We built and compared multiple predictive models that need to be further tested, but already indicate far reaching implications for theory and practice. We observe that novel ensemble approaches increase the predictive performance such models can be helpful to Epworth to better manage unplanned readmissions.en_US
dc.subjectHospital Readmissionsen_US
dc.subjectQuality of Care Indicatorsen_US
dc.subjectHysterectomyen_US
dc.subjectPredictive Modelen_US
dc.subjectRUSBoosten_US
dc.subjectUnderbaggingen_US
dc.subjectSMOTEBoosten_US
dc.subjectOverbaggingen_US
dc.subjectDecision Treeen_US
dc.subjectDTen_US
dc.subjectArtificial Neural Neten_US
dc.subjectANNen_US
dc.subjectSupport Vector Machineen_US
dc.subjectSVMen_US
dc.subjectAUC-Scoreen_US
dc.subjectChair of Health Informatics Management, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titlePredicting post hysterectomy unplanned hospital readmissions.en_US
dc.typeConference Posteren_US
dc.description.affiliatesFriedrich Alexander Universität, Germany.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDeakin University, Australiaen_US
dc.type.studyortrialValidation Studyen_US
dc.description.conferencenameEpworth HealthCare Research Week 2018en_US
dc.description.conferencelocationEpworth Research Institute, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Health Informatics
Research Week

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.