Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1391
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tomy, Anu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hutchinson, Ana | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ley, Lenore | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-20T02:42:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-20T02:42:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-06 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1391 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background Interventional cardiology has seen increasing procedural complexity and patient acuity. CCL nurses help protect patient safety. The aims of this project were to: (1) implement a CCL-specific pre-procedural checklist in a regional private hospital; (2) evaluate the checklist usability and feasibility in practice; and, (3) evaluate change in adherence to best practice guidelines post-checklist implementation when conducting the team ‘time-out’. Methods A multiple-methods study design was conducted. Phase 1: baseline pre-implementation staff surveys and silent observation audits; Phase 2: focus group interview, development and implementation of a CCL-specific checklist; Phase 3: post-implementation staff survey and observational audits to compare adherence to pre-procedural ‘sign-in’ and ‘time-out’ processes. CCL nurses (n=5, 56%) and radiographers (n=2 66%) participated. Results Focus groups supported the need for a CCL-specific checklist; key emerging themes included: a generic checklist is not ideal; information about medical history and having effective time-out briefing processes are essential; and CCL nurses have additional responsibilities for patient safety. Baseline audits revealed critical gaps in the ‘sign-in’ phase: patient identification (57%), alert card (29%), and allergy (71%) checking and staff participation during ‘time-out’ processes (28%). Post-implementation results showed improvement during the ‘sign-in’ phase: checking patient identification and procedure matching, alert cards, and patient allergies improved by 43%, 55% and 29%, respectively. All staff participated in the ‘time-out’ phase: checking alert cards (85%) and confirming allergies (100%). Conclusions Introducing a CCL-specific checklist to guide peri-procedure checks resulted in better adherence to practice standards for patient identity confirmation, procedure matching and conducting ‘time-out’ procedures. | en_US |
dc.subject | Interventional Cardiology | en_US |
dc.subject | Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory | en_US |
dc.subject | CCL | en_US |
dc.subject | Pre-Procedural Checklist | en_US |
dc.subject | Usability | en_US |
dc.subject | Feasibility | en_US |
dc.subject | Evaluation | en_US |
dc.subject | Adherence to Guidelines | en_US |
dc.subject | CCL Nurses | en_US |
dc.subject | Patient Safety | en_US |
dc.subject | Sign-In Phase | en_US |
dc.subject | Time-Out Phase | en_US |
dc.subject | Epworth/Deakin Centre for Clinical Nursing Research, Epworth Healthcare, Victoria, Australia. | en_US |
dc.title | Development and pilot of a Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory (CCL) specific pre-procedural checklist. (A multiple methods study). | en_US |
dc.type | Conference Poster | en_US |
dc.description.affiliates | Deakin University Geelong, Australia. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research | en_US |
dc.type.studyortrial | Observational Study | en_US |
dc.description.conferencename | Epworth HealthCare Research Week 2018 | en_US |
dc.description.conferencelocation | Epworth Research Institute, Victoria, Australia | en_US |
dc.type.contenttype | Text | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Cardiac Sciences Research Week |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.