Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1391
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTomy, Anu-
dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorLey, Lenore-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-20T02:42:41Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-20T02:42:41Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1391-
dc.description.abstractBackground Interventional cardiology has seen increasing procedural complexity and patient acuity. CCL nurses help protect patient safety. The aims of this project were to: (1) implement a CCL-specific pre-procedural checklist in a regional private hospital; (2) evaluate the checklist usability and feasibility in practice; and, (3) evaluate change in adherence to best practice guidelines post-checklist implementation when conducting the team ‘time-out’. Methods A multiple-methods study design was conducted. Phase 1: baseline pre-implementation staff surveys and silent observation audits; Phase 2: focus group interview, development and implementation of a CCL-specific checklist; Phase 3: post-implementation staff survey and observational audits to compare adherence to pre-procedural ‘sign-in’ and ‘time-out’ processes. CCL nurses (n=5, 56%) and radiographers (n=2 66%) participated. Results Focus groups supported the need for a CCL-specific checklist; key emerging themes included: a generic checklist is not ideal; information about medical history and having effective time-out briefing processes are essential; and CCL nurses have additional responsibilities for patient safety. Baseline audits revealed critical gaps in the ‘sign-in’ phase: patient identification (57%), alert card (29%), and allergy (71%) checking and staff participation during ‘time-out’ processes (28%). Post-implementation results showed improvement during the ‘sign-in’ phase: checking patient identification and procedure matching, alert cards, and patient allergies improved by 43%, 55% and 29%, respectively. All staff participated in the ‘time-out’ phase: checking alert cards (85%) and confirming allergies (100%). Conclusions Introducing a CCL-specific checklist to guide peri-procedure checks resulted in better adherence to practice standards for patient identity confirmation, procedure matching and conducting ‘time-out’ procedures.en_US
dc.subjectInterventional Cardiologyen_US
dc.subjectCardiac Catheterisation Laboratoryen_US
dc.subjectCCLen_US
dc.subjectPre-Procedural Checklisten_US
dc.subjectUsabilityen_US
dc.subjectFeasibilityen_US
dc.subjectEvaluationen_US
dc.subjectAdherence to Guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectCCL Nursesen_US
dc.subjectPatient Safetyen_US
dc.subjectSign-In Phaseen_US
dc.subjectTime-Out Phaseen_US
dc.subjectEpworth/Deakin Centre for Clinical Nursing Research, Epworth Healthcare, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.titleDevelopment and pilot of a Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory (CCL) specific pre-procedural checklist. (A multiple methods study).en_US
dc.typeConference Posteren_US
dc.description.affiliatesDeakin University Geelong, Australia. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Researchen_US
dc.type.studyortrialObservational Studyen_US
dc.description.conferencenameEpworth HealthCare Research Week 2018en_US
dc.description.conferencelocationEpworth Research Institute, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Cardiac Sciences
Research Week

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.