Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1249
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorLawrentschuk, Nathan-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Yee-
dc.contributor.otherHennessey, Derek-
dc.contributor.otherWei, G.-
dc.contributor.otherKinnear, N.-
dc.contributor.otherBolton, Damien-
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-09T01:09:04Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-09T01:09:04Z-
dc.date.issued2017-10-
dc.identifier.citationBJU Int. 2017 Oct 26en_US
dc.identifier.issn1464-410Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1464-4096en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1249-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Due to their size, location and proximity to the hilum, some complex renal tumours may preclude a minimally invasive approach to nephron sparing surgery. We describe our technique, illustrated with images and videos, of robotic partial nephrectomy for challenging renal tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A study of 249 patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in multiple institutions was performed. Patients were identified using prospective RPN databases. A complex renal lesion was defined as a RENAL nephrometry score ≥10. Data was presented as median (interquartile range) and differences between groups were examined. RESULTS: 31 (12.4%) RPN were performed for complex renal tumours. Median age was 57 (50.5 - 70.5) years. 21 (67.7%) were male, 10 (32.3%) were female. American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2 (2 - 3). Median operative time was 200 (50 - 265) min, median warm ischaemia time was 23 (18.5 - 29) min, and median blood loss was 200 (50 - 265) ml. There were no intraoperative complications. 2 (6.4%) patients had post-operative complications. 1 (3.2%) patient had a positive margin. Length of stay was 3.5 (3 - 5) days. Median follow up was 12.5 (7 - 24) months. There were no recurrences. RPN did result in statistically significant changes in renal function 3 months post RPN compared to preoperative renal function, p=0.0001. CONCLUSION: RPN is a safe approach for select patients with complex renal tumours and may facilitate tumour resection and renorrhaphy for challenging cases, offering a minimally invasive surgical option for patients who may otherwise require open surgery.en_US
dc.subjectRobotic Partial Nephrectomyen_US
dc.subjectRPNen_US
dc.subjectNephrectomyen_US
dc.subjectRenalen_US
dc.subjectRenal Tumoursen_US
dc.subjectNephron-Sparing Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectNSSen_US
dc.subjectMinimally Invasive Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectUroRenal, Vascular Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleStrategies for success: A multi-institutional study on robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal lesions.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bju.14059en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleBJU Internationalen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29072806en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesOlivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialCase Series and Case Reportsen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:UroRenal, Vascular

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.