Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1219
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGerraty, Richard-
dc.contributor.otherOlaiya, Muideen-
dc.contributor.otherKim, Joosup-
dc.contributor.otherNelson, Mark-
dc.contributor.otherSrikanth, Velandai-
dc.contributor.otherBladin, Christopher-
dc.contributor.otherFitzgerald, Sharyn-
dc.contributor.otherPhan, Thanh-
dc.contributor.otherFrayne, Judith-
dc.contributor.otherCadilhac, Dominique-
dc.contributor.otherThrift, Amanda-
dc.date2017-05-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-06T03:24:35Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-06T03:24:35Z-
dc.date.issued2017-07-
dc.identifier.citationEur J Neurol. 2017 Jul;24(7):920-928en_US
dc.identifier.issn1468-1331en_US
dc.identifier.issn1351-5101en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1219-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Limited evidence exists on the benefits of organized care for improving risk factor control in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack. The effectiveness of an individualized management programme in reducing absolute cardiovascular disease risk in this high-risk population was determined. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicentre, cluster-randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of outcomes and intention-to-treat analysis. Patients hospitalized for stroke/transient ischaemic attack and aged ≥18 years were recruited from four hospitals. General practices treating recruited patients were randomized to provide either usual care or an individualized management programme comprising nurse-led education and review of care plans by stroke specialists in addition to usual care. The primary outcome was a change in cardiovascular Framingham Risk Score between baseline and 12 months. RESULTS: From January 2010 to November 2013, 156 general practices (280 patients) were randomly assigned to usual care (control) and 159 (283 patients) to the intervention. The median age was 70.1 years; 65% were male. Overall, >80% of participants were prescribed recommended secondary prevention therapies at baseline. The primary efficacy analysis comprised 533 participants, with 30 either dying or lost to follow-up. In adjusted analyses, no significant between-group difference was found in the cardiovascular risk score at 12 months (0.04, 95% confidence interval -1.7, 1.8). CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of an organized secondary prevention programme for stroke may be limited in patients from high-performing hospitals with regular post-discharge follow-up and communication with general practices.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Online Libraryen_US
dc.subjectTransient Ischaemic Attacken_US
dc.subjectTIAen_US
dc.subjectRisk Factorsen_US
dc.subjectCardiovascular Disease Risken_US
dc.subjectSecondary Preventionen_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.subjectIndividualized Management Programmeen_US
dc.subjectRandomized Clinical Trialen_US
dc.subjectUsual Careen_US
dc.subjectNurse-Led Educationen_US
dc.subjectStroke Specialistsen_US
dc.subjectCare Plansen_US
dc.subjectCardiovascular Framingham Risk Scoreen_US
dc.subjectSecondary Prevention Therapiesen_US
dc.subjectNeurosciences Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.subjectDepartment of Medicine, Epworth Healthcare, Australia.en_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of a shared team approach between nurses and doctors for improved risk factor management in survivors of stroke: a cluster randomized controlled trial.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ene.13306en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleEuropean Journal of Neurologyen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28488353en_US
dc.description.affiliatesStroke and Ageing Research, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesStroke Division, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Vic, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesMenzies Institute for Medical Research, Hobart, Tas, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Neurosciences, Box Hill Hospital, Box Hill, Vic., Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Neurology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialMulticentre Studiesen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Neurosciences
Rehabilitation

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.