Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/831
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Declan-
dc.contributor.otherAhmed, Kamran-
dc.contributor.otherKhan, Reenam-
dc.contributor.otherMottrie, Alexandre-
dc.contributor.otherLovegrove, Catherine-
dc.contributor.otherAbaza, Ronney-
dc.contributor.otherAhlawat, Rajesh-
dc.contributor.otherAhlering, Thomas-
dc.contributor.otherAhlgren, Goran-
dc.contributor.otherArtibani, Walter-
dc.contributor.otherBarret, Eric-
dc.contributor.otherCathelineau, Xavier-
dc.contributor.otherChallacombe, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.otherColoby, Patrick-
dc.contributor.otherKhan, Muhammed-
dc.contributor.otherHubert, Jacques-
dc.contributor.otherMichel, Maurice-
dc.contributor.otherMontorsi, Francesco-
dc.contributor.otherPalou, Joan-
dc.contributor.otherPatel, Vipul-
dc.contributor.otherPiechaud, Pierre-Thierry-
dc.contributor.otherVan Poppel, Hendrik-
dc.contributor.otherRischmann, Pascal-
dc.contributor.otherSanchez-Salas, Rafael-
dc.contributor.otherSiemer, Stefan-
dc.contributor.otherStoeckle, Michael-
dc.contributor.otherStolzenburge, Jens-Uwe-
dc.contributor.otherTerrier, Jean-Etienne-
dc.contributor.otherThuroff, Joachim-
dc.contributor.otherVaessen, Christophe-
dc.contributor.othervan der Poel, Henk-
dc.contributor.otherVan Cleynenbreugel, Ben-
dc.contributor.otherVolpe, Alessandro-
dc.contributor.otherWagner, Christian-
dc.contributor.otherWiklund, Peter-
dc.contributor.otherWilson, Timothy-
dc.contributor.otherWirth, Manfred-
dc.contributor.otherWitt, Jorn-
dc.contributor.otherDasgupta, Prokar-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T05:28:45Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T05:28:45Z-
dc.date.issued2015-07-
dc.identifier.citationBJU Int. 2015 Jul;116(1):93-101.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1464-4096en_US
dc.identifier.issn1464-410Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/831-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To explore the views of experts about the development and validation of a robotic surgery training curriculum, and how this should be implemented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international expert panel was invited to a structured session for discussion. The study was of a mixed design, including qualitative and quantitative components based on focus group interviews during the European Association of Urology (EAU) Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) (2012), EAU (2013) and ERUS (2013) meetings. After introduction to the aims, principles and current status of the curriculum development, group responses were elicited. After content analysis of recorded interviews generated themes were discussed at the second meeting, where consensus was achieved on each theme. This discussion also underwent content analysis, and was used to draft a curriculum proposal. At the third meeting, a quantitative questionnaire about this curriculum was disseminated to attendees to assess the level of agreement with the key points. RESULTS: In all, 150 min (19 pages) of the focus group discussion was transcribed (21 316 words). Themes were agreed by two raters (median agreement κ 0.89) and they included: need for a training curriculum (inter-rater agreement κ 0.85); identification of learning needs (κ 0.83); development of the curriculum contents (κ 0.81); an overview of available curricula (κ 0.79); settings for robotic surgery training ((κ 0.89); assessment and training of trainers (κ 0.92); requirements for certification and patient safety (κ 0.83); and need for a universally standardised curriculum (κ 0.78). A training curriculum was proposed based on the above discussions. CONCLUSION: This group proposes a multi-step curriculum for robotic training. Studies are in process to validate the effectiveness of the curriculum and to assess transfer of skills to the operating room.en_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectRobotic Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectTrainingen_US
dc.subjectImplementationen_US
dc.subjectCurriculumen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectLearning Needsen_US
dc.subjectRoboticsen_US
dc.subjectValidationen_US
dc.subjectExpert Opinionen_US
dc.subjectSurveyen_US
dc.subjectEpworth Prostate Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.subjectUroRenal, Vascular Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleDevelopment of a standardised training curriculum for robotic surgery: a consensus statement from an international multidisciplinary group of experts.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bju.12974en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleBJU Internationalen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25359658en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, OLV Vattikuti Robotic Surgery Institute, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G James Cancer Hospital & Richard J Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesMedanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesUrology Clinic, A.O.U.I. Verona, Verona, Italy.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesService d'Urologie, Centre Hospitalier René-Dubos, Cergy-Pontoise, France.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesService d'Urologie, CHRU Nancy, Vandoeeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesUniversity Hospital, Mannheim, Germany.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesGlobal Robotics Institute, Florida Hospital Celebration Health, Celebration, FL, USA.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesClinique Saint-Augustin, Bordeaux, France.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesService de Chirurgie Urologique, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesKlinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesService D'Urologie et de Transplantation Réno-Pancréatique, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, Franceen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesUniversity of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesSt. Antonius-Hospital Gronau, Gronau, Germany.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDivision of Urology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialExploratory Qualitative Designen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Clinical Education & Simulation
UroRenal, Vascular

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.