Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/804
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Gavin-
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Meg-
dc.contributor.authorClark, Ross-
dc.contributor.authorOlver, John-
dc.contributor.otherAda, L.-
dc.contributor.otherHassett, L.-
dc.contributor.otherBryant, Adam-
dc.date2016-06-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-16T04:05:10Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-16T04:05:10Z-
dc.date.issued2016-07-
dc.identifier.citationJ Physiother. 2016 Jul;62(3):164en_US
dc.identifier.issn1836-9553en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/804-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury is the leading cause of disability in young adults aged 15 to 45 years. Mobility limitations are prevalent, and range in severity from interfering with basic day-to-day tasks to restricting participation in higher level social, leisure, employment and sporting activities. Despite the prevalence and severity of physical impairments, such as poor balance and spasticity, the main contributor to mobility limitations following traumatic brain injury is low muscle power generation. Strengthening exercises that are performed quickly are termed 'ballistic' as they are aimed at improving the rate of force production and, hence, muscle power. This is compared with conventional strength training, which is performed slowly and aims to improve maximum force production, yet has limited impact on mobility. RESEARCH QUESTION: In people recovering from traumatic brain injury: (1) is a 12-week ballistic strength-training program targeting the three muscle groups critical for walking more effective than usual care at improving mobility, strength and balance; and (2) does improved mobility translate to better health-related quality of life? DESIGN: A prospective, multi-centre, randomised, single-blind trial with concealed allocation will be conducted. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Participants will be patients with a neurologically based movement disorder affecting mobility as a result of traumatic brain injury. Patients will be recruited during the acute phase of rehabilitation (n=166), from brain injury units in large metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. INTERVENTION: For 12 weeks, participants in the experimental group will have three 60-minute sessions of usual physiotherapy intervention replaced by three 60-minute sessions of strength training (ballistic strength, gait). The three key muscle groups responsible for forward propulsion will be targeted: ankle plantarflexors, hip flexors and the hip extensors. Initial loads will be low, to facilitate high contraction velocities. Progression to higher loads will occur only if participants can perform the exercises ballistically. The control group will have their three 60-minute sessions of usual physiotherapy intervention (balance, strength, stretch, cardiovascular fitness, gait) standardised so that all participants have equivalent therapy time. Both groups will continue to receive usual rehabilitation. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome will be mobility, measured using the High Level Mobility Assessment Tool. The secondary outcomes will be walking speed, muscle strength, balance and health-related quality of life. Walking speed will be measured using the 10-m walking test. Strength will be measured by a 6 repetition maximum, seated, single leg press test. Balance will be measured as the single limb support time. Health-related quality of life will be measured using the Assessment of Quality of Life. Outcomes will be measured at baseline (0 months), at completion of the intervention phase (3 months), and 3 months after cessation of intervention (6 months). Baseline measures will be completed prior to randomisation. Assessors blinded to group allocation will perform all measures. ANALYSIS: Baseline characteristics of participants will be determined according to group, using descriptive statistics. The proportion of patients compliant with the intervention will be calculated according to group and compared using Fisher's exact test. Compliance with the intervention will be defined as those who have satisfactorily completed at least 80% of the allocated sessions (29 of 36 sessions). The between-group difference for all outcomes will be estimated using analysis of covariance, adjusting for baseline High Level Mobility Assessment Tool score, age, gender and length of post-traumatic amnesia. Analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. DISCUSSION: Strength training in neurological rehabilitation is highly topical because muscle weakness has been identified as the primary impairment leading to mobility limitations in many neurological populations. This project represents the first international study of ballistic strength training after traumatic brain injury. The novelty of ballistic strength training is that the exercises attempt to replicate how lower limb muscles work, by targeting the high angular velocities attained during walking and higher level activities.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectTraumatic Brain Injuryen_US
dc.subjectTBIen_US
dc.subjectExercise Therapyen_US
dc.subjectNeurological Rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectBallistic Strength Trainingen_US
dc.subjectAnkle Plantarflexorsen_US
dc.subjectHip Flexorsen_US
dc.subjectHip Extensorsen_US
dc.subjectHigh Level Mobility Assessment Toolen_US
dc.subjectMuscle Strengthen_US
dc.subjectMuscle Weaknessen_US
dc.subjectFisher's Exact Testen_US
dc.subjectMobility Limitationen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitation Medicine, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitation, Mental Health and Chronic Pain Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapy Department, Epworth HealthCareen_US
dc.titleBallistic strength training compared with usual care for improving mobility following traumatic brain injury: protocol for a randomised, controlled trial.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jphys.2016.04.003en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Physiotherapyen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27320832en_US
dc.description.affiliatesSchool of Physiotherapy, Faulty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourneen_US
dc.description.affiliatesFaculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydneyen_US
dc.description.affiliatesThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydneyen_US
dc.description.affiliatesHealthscope and School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourneen_US
dc.description.affiliatesSchool of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downsen_US
dc.type.studyortrialProspective Studyen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Neurosciences
Rehabilitation

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.