Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/658
Title: Impact of tumour bed boost integration on acute and late toxicity in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review.
Epworth Authors: Hamilton, Daniel
Jones, Claire
Fitzgerald, Emma
Wasiak, Jason
Other Authors: Bale, R.
Khor, Richard
Knight, Kellie
Keywords: Breast Neoplasms
Breast Cancer
Radiotherapy
Concomitant Boost
Treatment Outcomes
Toxicity
Hypofractionated
Normofractionated
Newcastle–Ottawa Scale
Epworth Radiation Oncology Research Centre
Issue Date: Jun-2016
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Breast. 2016 Apr 22;27:126-135.
Abstract: The purpose of this systematic review was to summarise the evidence from studies investigating the integration of tumour bed boosts into whole breast irradiation for patients with Stage 0-III breast cancer, with a focus on its impact on acute and late toxicities. A comprehensive systematic electronic search through the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases from January 2000 to January 2015 was conducted. Studies were considered eligible if they investigated the efficacy of hypo- or normofractionated whole breast irradiation with the inclusion of a daily concurrent boost. The primary outcomes of interest were the degree of observed acute and late toxicity following radiotherapy treatment. Methodological quality assessment was performed on all included studies using either the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale or a previously published investigator-derived quality instrument. The search identified 35 articles, of which 17 satisfied our eligibility criteria. Thirteen and eleven studies reported on acute and late toxicities respectively. Grade 3 acute skin toxicity ranged from 1 to 7% whilst moderate to severe fibrosis and telangiectasia were both limited to 9%. Reported toxicity profiles were comparable to historical data at similar time-points. Studies investigating the delivery of concurrent boosts with whole breast radiotherapy courses report safe short to medium-term toxicity profiles and cosmesis rates. Whilst the quality of evidence and length of follow-up supporting these findings is low, sufficient evidence has been generated to consider concurrent boost techniques as an alternative to conventional sequential techniques.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/658
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.03.002
PubMed URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27113229
ISSN: 0960-9776
Journal Title: The Breast
Type: Journal Article
Affiliated Organisations: Austin Health, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg VIC
Department of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton VIC
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Reviews/Systematic Reviews
Appears in Collections:Cancer Services
Radiation Oncology

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in EKB are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.