Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/620
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKahn, Michelle-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Gavin-
dc.contributor.otherMentiplay, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.otherClark, Ross-
dc.contributor.otherBower, Kelly-
dc.date2016-02-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-10T01:13:39Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-10T01:13:39Z-
dc.date.issued2016-02-
dc.identifier.citationBrain Inj. 2016;30(3):252-66en_US
dc.identifier.issn1362-301Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/620-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To determine the assessment methods for upper limb (UL) associated reactions (ARs) in people with acquired brain injury (ABI). METHODS: A systematic search of 10 databases was performed for Stage 1 to identify methods that quantify ARs of the hemiplegic UL. Stage 2 searched four databases to examine the clinimetric properties and clinical utility of these methods. Two independent reviewers identified relevant articles, extracted data, assessed study methodological quality and rated the clinimetric properties and clinical utility. RESULTS: Eighteen articles were included. The methods used to evaluate ARs were surface electromyography (11), goniometry (5), dynamometry (5), electrogoniometry (1), subjective clinician (2) and patient rating forms (2). Electromyography, electrogoniometry and dynamometry implemented stationary, seated positions using maximal voluntary contractions of the less impaired UL as the provocative task. Standard goniometry most frequently tested ARs dynamically, using a mobility task to provoke the AR. There was limited clinimetric data available. Only half of the assessment methods were deemed clinically feasible. The most common methods were laboratory-based. CONCLUSION: There were a limited number of methods used to assess ARs in people with ABI and the measurement properties of these outcomes were largely unreported. No gold standard was identified.en_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Onlineen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Therapy Modalitiesen_US
dc.subjectBrain Injuryen_US
dc.subjectTBIen_US
dc.subjectTraumatic Brain Injuryen_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.subjectUpper Limben_US
dc.subjectAcquired Brain Injuryen_US
dc.subjectABIen_US
dc.subjectAssessmenten_US
dc.subjectAssociated Reactionsen_US
dc.subjectSystematic Reviewen_US
dc.subjectBrain Injuriesen_US
dc.subjectUpper Extremityen_US
dc.subjectNeurological Rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectNeuroscienceen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectDepartment of Physiotherapy , Epworth Healthcare , Victoria , Australiaen_US
dc.titleMethods of assessing associated reactions of the upper limb in stroke and traumatic brain injury: A systematic review.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/02699052en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleBrain Injuryen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26829556en_US
dc.description.affiliatesFaculty of Health Sciences , Australian Catholic University , Melbourne , Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Physiotherapy , University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Physiotherapy , La Trobe University , Melbourne , Australiaen_US
dc.type.studyortrialSystematic Reviewsen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Neurosciences
Rehabilitation

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.