Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/487
Title: Consistent evaluation of treatment outcomes across subacute and community settings: experience of the Graduated Discharge Program.
Epworth Authors: Wise, Frances
Other Authors: Umansky, Svetlana
Woolley, Kerryn
Hunter, Peter
Holland, Anne
Keywords: Graduated Discharge Program
GDP
Treatment Outcomes
Community Health Services
Patient Discharge
Rehabilitation
Health Care Surveys
Analysis Of Variance
Subacute
Community Settings
Outcome Assessment
Patient Satisfaction
Timed Up And Go Test
TUAG
Epworth Monash Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Epworth Hospital, Richmond, VIC, Australia
Issue Date: Nov-2011
Publisher: CSIRO
Citation: Aust Health Rev. 2011 Nov;35(4):486-90
Abstract: OBJECTIVE; Although mounting evidence suggests that early supporting discharge has benefits for both patients and the health service, such programs pose unique challenges for rigorous assessment of treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to describe assessment of clinical outcomes in the Graduated Discharge Program (GDP) across hospital and community settings. METHODS: The GDP involved substitution of community-based rehabilitation for the last week of inpatient care. A consensus group of hospital and community rehabilitation professionals chose the Timed Up and Go (TUAG) test as the primary clinical outcome that would be assessed across settings, with data stored in the community. We recorded the consistency of test performance across settings and readmission rates. RESULTS: At hospital admission TUAG results were available for 82% of participants, compared to 94% at subacute discharge, 89% at end of GDP and 77% at end of community rehabilitation. Seat height during testing did not remain consistent across settings; however, significant improvements in TUAG were seen over time. There was no increase in readmission rate during the GDP. CONCLUSIONS; By involving members of the treating team in decisions about outcome assessment and data storage it was possible to reliably document clinical outcomes across multiple settings of care.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/487
DOI: 10.1071/AH10956
PubMed URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22126954
ISSN: 0156-5788
0159-5709
Journal Title: Australian Health Review
Type: Journal Article
Affiliated Organisations: Alfred Health, Caulfield Hospital, VIC, Australia
La Trobe University, Physiotherapy Department, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Cohort Study
Appears in Collections:Health Administration
Rehabilitation

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in EKB are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.