Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/486
Title: Do patient reported outcome measures in hip and knee arthroplasty rehabilitation have robust measurement attributes? A systematic review.
Epworth Authors: Olver, John
Other Authors: Alvar, Maria
Brand, Caroline
Tropea, Joanne
Khan, Fary
Hale, Tom
Pirpiris, Marinis
Keywords: Hip Arthroplasty
Knee Arthoplasty
Arthroplasty Replacement
Osteoarthritis
Hip Surgery
Knee Surgery
Psychometrics
Recovery Of Function
Self Report
Reproducibility Of Results
Validation Studies
Disability Evaluation
Rehabilitation
Outcome Measures
Rehabilitation Outcome Measures
Issue Date: Jun-2011
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Citation: J Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;43(7):572-83.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically review and compare the measurement attributes of multidimensional, patient-reported outcome measures used in hip and knee arthroplasty rehabilitation. METHODS: A search of PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Registry, SCOPUS and PEDro databases up to December 2009 identified the validation studies. The quality of the measurement properties were assessed based on the Terwee and Bot criteria, and Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 68 studies examining 28 instruments were identified. Three instruments had positive ratings for content validity. None of the instruments satisfied both factor analysis and Cronbach's α criteria for internal consistency. Four measures were positively-rated for agreement. Nine tools had positive ratings for construct validity. Twenty-four of the instruments had indeterminate ratings for responsiveness to clinical change. Only certain subscales of 2 instruments were positively-rated for responsiveness to clinical change. CONCLUSION: A wide variety of multidimensional patient-reported instruments has been used to assess rehabilitation outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty, but information about their measurement attributes in these populations is inadequate. More data are needed to clarify their reproducibility and responsiveness to clinical change.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/486
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0828
URL: http://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/download.php?doi=10.2340/16501977-0828
PubMed URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21607295
ISSN: 1650-1977
Journal Title: Journal of Rehabiliation Medicine
Type: Journal Article
Affiliated Organisations: The University of Melbourne (Parkville Campus), Victoria, Australia
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Services Research, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria Australia
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Reviews/Systematic Reviews
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal
Rehabilitation



Items in EKB are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.