Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/385
Title: Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Epworth Authors: Patel, Minoo
Knox, David
Other Authors: Ackland, David
Keywords: Rotator Cuff Tears
Osteoarthritis
Glenohumeral Joint
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
RSA
Shoulder Function
Shoulder Pain
Strength
Range of Motion
Shoulder Elevation
Prosthesis
Biomechanics
Surgery
Deltoid
Complications
Surgical Technique
Intra-Operative Joint Exposure
Post-Operative Muscle Function
Implant Design
Component Positioning
Musculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia
Orthopaedic Surgery, Epworth Healthcare, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: Jul-2015
Publisher: BioMed Central
Citation: J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Jul 2;10:101.
Abstract: The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears associated with osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint has long been challenging. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was designed to provide pain relief and improve shoulder function in patients with severe rotator cuff tear arthropathy. While this procedure has been known to reduce pain, improve strength and increase range of motion in shoulder elevation, scapular notching, rotation deficiency, early implant loosening and dislocation have attributed to complication rates as high as 62 %. Patient selection, surgical approach and post-operative management are factors vital to successful outcome of RSA, with implant design and component positioning having a significant influence on the ability of the shoulder muscles to elevate, axially rotate and stabilise the humerus. Clinical and biomechanical studies have revealed that component design and placement affects the location of the joint centre of rotation and therefore the force-generating capacity of the muscles and overall joint mobility and stability. Furthermore, surgical technique has also been shown to have an important influence on clinical outcome of RSA, as it can affect intra-operative joint exposure as well as post-operative muscle function. This review discusses the behaviour of the shoulder after RSA and the influence of implant design, component positioning and surgical technique on post-operative joint function and clinical outcome.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/385
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-015-0244-2.
PubMed URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26135298
ISSN: 1749-799X
Journal Title: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Type: Journal Article
Affiliated Organisations: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Review
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal
Annual Reports

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.pdf1.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in EKB are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.