Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11434/378
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Crowe, Jane | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wootten, Addie | - |
dc.contributor.author | Howard, Nicholas | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-17T04:15:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-09-17T04:15:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013-11 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Aust J Prim Health. 2013;21(1):111-4. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1448-7527 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11434/378 | - |
dc.description | Dates of Publication vary: CSIRO Publishing state Submitted: 5 July 2013 Accepted: 24 September 2013 Published: 1 November 2013, PubMed state 2015 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The role of the General Practitioner (GP) in testing for and managing men with prostate cancer (PCa) is significant. Very few studies have explored the attitudes and practices of Australian GPs in the context of the role of PCa testing. In this study, a 46-item web-based questionnaire was used to assess self-reported PCa testing attitudes and practices of GPs. This questionnaire was circulated to divisions of general practice and Medicare locals for further distribution to their GP members across Australia. GPs from all states and territories participated, and a total of 136 GPs completed the survey. Of the responding GPs, 57% always or usually offered PCa testing to asymptomatic men ≤ 70 years of age and 60% of GPs always or usually included a digital rectal examination (DRE). Many (80%) of the GPs stated that the current PCa testing guidelines were not clear. PCa testing was offered opportunistically by 56% while 39% offered testing at the patient's request. The results captured in this study represent a snapshot of GP attitudes and practices from across Australia. The results presented indicate a wide variation in the approaches to PCa testing in general practice across Australia, which in most part appear to be related to the lack of clarity of the current prostate cancer testing guidelines. | en_US |
dc.publisher | CSIRO Publishing | en_US |
dc.subject | Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Victoria, Australia | en_US |
dc.subject | Attitude of Health Personnel | en_US |
dc.subject | Prostate Cancer Testing | en_US |
dc.subject | General Practitioners | en_US |
dc.subject | Guideline Adherence | en_US |
dc.subject | Prostatic Neoplasms | en_US |
dc.subject | Practice Guidelines as Topic | en_US |
dc.subject | Physician's Practice Patterns | en_US |
dc.subject | Australia | en_US |
dc.subject | Questionnaires | en_US |
dc.subject | Digital Rectal Examination | en_US |
dc.subject | Prostate-Specific Antigen | en_US |
dc.title | Prostate cancer testing: a snapshot of the attitudes and practice of Australian general practitioners. | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1071/PY13078 | en_US |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | Australian Journal of Primary Health | en_US |
dc.description.pubmeduri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24176263 | en_US |
dc.type.studyortrial | Survey | en_US |
dc.type.contenttype | Text | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Cancer Services Epworth Prostate Centre |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.