Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Choice of approach does not affect clinical and radiological outcomes: A comparative cohort of ALIF and XLIF patients at 12 months.|
|Epworth Authors:||Malham, Gregory|
|Keywords:||Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion|
Degenerative Disc Disease
Neurosciences Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia
|Conference:||29th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society, NASS 2014.|
|Conference Location:||San Francisco, California, United States.|
|Abstract:||Lumbar interbody fusion is an accepted surgical technique to address severe degenerative disc disease, radiculopathy and deformity. Anterior fusion techniques such as ALIF (anterior lumbar interbody fusion) and XLIF (extreme lateral interbody fusion) are relatively newer techniques for interbody fusion compared to more widely used traditional posterior methods (posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (P/TLIF).|
|Affiliated Organisations:||Macquarie University Neurosurgery Department, Sydney, NSW.|
Hillingdon Hospital Orthopaedics/Geriatrics, Uxbridge, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
|Appears in Collections:||Neurosciences|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in EKB are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.