Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1742
Title: Good clinical practice can and must include comparative effectiveness research.
Authors: Zeps, Nik
Other Authors: Davis, Ian
Mark, Stephen
Keywords: Clinical Practice
Research
Continuous Improvement
Virtuous Cycle
Effectiveness
Comparative Effectiveness Research
CER
Standard of Care
SOC
Data
Clinical Trial
Govenance
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
ERAS
Research and Development
Issue Date: Nov-2018
Publisher: Wiley
Citation: BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122 Suppl 5:7-8
Abstract: Key components of self‐improving healthcare systems are their ability to collect baseline data, identify opportunities for improvement, design and implement strategies for change, and measure the effectiveness and other outcomes of the intervention, in a ‘virtuous cycle’ of continuous improvement. Nowhere is this more clearly outlined than in the process of clinical trials of new interventions. The concept of development and implementation of new evidence is straightforward, but can be very difficult to achieve in practice. Cultural and infrastructural issues present significant barriers to achieving the ideal of continuous and consistent derivation of evidence to support changes in practice.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1742
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14590
PubMed URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30421560
ISSN: 1464-410X
Journal Title: BJU International
Type: Journal Article
Affiliated Organisations: Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Vic, Australia
University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
Appears in Collections:Pre-Clinical

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Good clinical practice can and must includecomparative effectiveness research.pdf67.18 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.