Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1522
Title: What is the long-term survival for primary THA with small-head metal-on-metal bearings?
Epworth Authors: de Steiger, Richard
Other Authors: Peng, A.
Lewis, P.
Graves, S.
Keywords: Small-Head
Large-Head
MoM
Hip Replacements
Revision
Survivorship
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry
Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Primary Conventional THA
Osteoarthritis
Prostheses
Bearing Surfaces
Joint Arthroplasties
Longitudinal Data
Cumulative Percent Revision
Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris
ARMD
Musculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: Jun-2018
Publisher: LWW
Citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jun;476(6):1231-1237.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Large-head metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing hip replacements have been shown to have a much higher rate of hip replacements than other bearing surfaces. However, small-head (≤ 32 mm) MoM bearing surfaces have been in use for many years with several reports of satisfactory mid- to long-term survivorship. It is unclear whether the long-term survival of small-head MoM devices will continue to be satisfactory or whether the same concerns seen with the large-head MoM devices will ultimately become more prevalent. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We analyzed a large national registry to ask: (1) What is the 15-year Kaplan-Meier survivorship of primary conventional THA using small-head (≤ 32 mm) MoM bearing surfaces compared with large-head MoM bearing surfaces in primary THA? (2) Is there an increased rate of revision for adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) in this group of patients over time? METHODS: The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry longitudinally maintains data on all primary and revision joint arthroplasties with nearly 100% capture. We analyzed all conventional primary THAs performed from Registry inception in September 1999 until December 31, 2015, in patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis and using MoM bearing surfaces ≤ 32 mm in diameter, defined as small-head MoM. The study group included 4838 primary THA with ≤ 32-mm MoM bearing surfaces. There were 2506 (51.8%) male patients and the median age of patients undergoing THA with a small-head MoM bearing surface was 64 years (range, 20-92 years of age). The outcome measure was the cumulative percent revision defined as the time to first revision using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship at 15 years; reasons for revision and type of revision were also examined. We specifically investigated whether there was an increased risk of revision for ARMD in this MoM group compared with all other bearing surfaces. We compared these results with large-head MoM THAs (femoral head size > 32 mm). RESULTS: The cumulative percent revision for small-head MoM designs at 15 years was 8.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3-9.9). The cumulative percent revision for large-head MoM at 14 years was 27.4% (95% CI, 24.8-30.2). Prostheses with a large-head MoM articulation have a higher rate of revision than small-head MoM bearing surfaces (hazard ratio after 6 years, 5.14; 95% CI, 4.1-6.5; p < 0.001). Over time, there was a gradual increase in the diagnosis of ARMD for small-head MoM and the cumulative incidence of revision for ARMD was 0.8% at 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: Despite survival that is substantially greater than that of large-head MoM THAs, there has been a marked decrease in the use of small-head MoM designs in our registry. Although the reasons for this are likely multifactorial, the increasing incidence of revisions for ARMD among small-head MoM THAs is concerning.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1522
DOI: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000209
PubMed URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29432270
ISSN: 1528-1132
0009-921X
Journal Title: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Type: Journal Article
Affiliated Organisations: South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry
University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Therapeutic Study
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in EKB are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.