Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Do we practise what we preach? Are knowledge management systems in practice truly reflective of knowledge management systems in theory?|
Knowledge Management Systems
Organizational Memory Systems
Chair of Health Informatics Management, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia
|Publisher:||MCB UP Ltd|
|Citation:||Business Process Management Journal, June 2003; 9(3): 295-316|
|Abstract:||Knowledge management systems are predominant in both theory and practice. However, are the same systems discussed in theory actualized in practice? By comparing and contrasting knowledge management systems in theory and practice, this paper demonstrates that they are indeed dissimilar. In theory, they have both subjective and objective components. In practice, only the objective component appears to be actualized; hence, these systems in practice are essentially organizational memory systems at best and not knowledge management systems at all. By unravelling the mystique of knowledge management systems, this paper exposes a fundamental anomaly. Further, an apparent void currently in practice is highlighted; namely, the lack of the subjective component of knowledge management systems in practice. They are being heralded as key systems that are vital for organizations to survive and thrive in the intense competitive environment of the information age. Surely then, a system that in practice supports not only the objective component, but also the subjective component of knowledge management, would indeed be a truly powerful system.|
|Journal Title:||Business Process Management Journal|
|Affiliated Organisations:||James J. Nance College of Business Administration, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA|
|Appears in Collections:||Health Informatics|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.