Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||An observational study of patient care outcomes sensitive to handover quality in the Post-Anaesthetic Care Unit.|
|Other Authors:||Lillibridge, Nichole|
Post-Anaesthetic Care Unit
Delivery of Care
Patient Care Activities
Pain on Discharge
Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Epworth HealthCare Partnership
Epworth/Deakin Centre for Clinical Nursing Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chair of Nursing, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|Publisher:||Wiley Online Library|
|Citation:||J Clin Nurs. 2017 May 19|
|Abstract:||AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To identify patient care outcome indicators sensitive to the quality of interprofessional handover between the anaesthetist and the Post-Anaesthetic Care Unit nurse. BACKGROUND: The relationship between interprofessional clinical handover when patients are transferred from the operating theatre to the Post-Anaesthetic Care Unit and patient outcomes of subsequent patient care delivery is not well understood. DESIGN: Naturalistic, exploratory descriptive design using observation. METHODS: Observations of 31 patient journeys through Post-Anaesthetic Care Units across three public and private hospitals. Characteristics of interprofessional handover on arrival in the Post-Anaesthetic Care Unit, the trajectory of patient care activities in Post-Anaesthetic Care Unit and patient outcomes were observed. RESULTS: Of the 821 care activities observed across 31 "patient journeys" in the Post-Anaesthetic Care Unit, observations (assessments and vital signs) (52.5 %), communication (15.8 %) and pain management (assessment of pain and analgesic administration) (10.3%) were most common. Examination of patterns in handover communications and subsequent trajectories of patient care activities revealed three patient trajectory typologies and two patient outcome indicators expected to be sensitive to the quality of interprofessional handover communication in the Post-Anaesthetic Care Unit: pain on discharge from the Post-Anaesthetic Care Unit and timely response to clinical deterioration. An additional process indicator, seeking missing information, was also identified. CONCLUSIONS: Patient's pain on discharge from Post-Anaesthetic Care Unit, escalation of care in response to early signs of deterioration and the need for nurses to seek out missing information to deliver care are indicators expected to be sensitive to the quality of interprofessional handover communication in the Post-Anaesthetic Care Unit. Future research should test these indicators. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Patient outcomes sensitive to the quality of interprofessional handover on patient arrival in the Post-Anaesthetic Care Unit can be used to evaluate handover quality improvement initiatives. Quality handovers can improve management of pain and clinical deterioration in Post-Anaesthetic Care Unit and reduce time wasted searching for missing information.|
|Journal Title:||Journal of Clinical Nursing|
|Affiliated Organisations:||School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic., Australia.|
The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Vic., Australia.
Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research-Monash Health Partnership, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Clayton, Vic., Australia.
|Type of Clinical Study or Trial:||Observational Study|
|Appears in Collections:||Health Administration|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.