Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1189
Title: Validity of motor tasks for predicting running ability in acquired brain injury.
Epworth Authors: Williams, Gavin
Other Authors: Goldie, Patricia
Keywords: Brain Injuries
Rehabilitation
Complications
Motor Skills
Classification
Motor Skills Disorders
Etiology
Physical Therapy Modalities
Severity of Illness Index
Task Performance and Analysis
Running
Traumatic Brain Injury
TBI
Quality of Life
QoL
Performance Predictors
Retest Reliability
Validity
Retraining Programme
Bethesda Rehabilitation Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Department of Physiotherapy , Epworth Healthcare , Victoria , Australia
Issue Date: Sep-2001
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Citation: Brain Inj. 2001 Sep;15(9):831-41
Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Rehabilitation of running following traumatic brain injury (TBI) has the potential to enhance quality of life. Retraining of running following TBI has not been previously reported in the literature. In response to a lack of information about which motor tasks should be included in a retraining programme, this study aimed to investigate performance predictors of running ability. METHOD: Forty TBI subjects (20 runners and 20 non-runners) performed four specific motor tasks which were selected on the basis of theory and clinical experience with TBI subjects. The four tasks included bounding onto a leg, walking on toes, stepping backwards up a step, and balancing on one leg. Subjects were generally extremely severely brain damaged (median post-traumatic amnesia >28 days), had suffered multiple leg fractures and had received greater than 8 months rehabilitation. RESULTS: The four motor tasks differentiated significantly between the two groups (p < 0.001) and were all strong predictors of running ability. The presence of a non-support phase (NSP) during the bounding task was the strongest predictor of running ability. Logistic regression indicated that TBI subjects who could execute a NSP into a single bound were 24.6 times more likely to be able to run than subjects who could not. When the four tasks were used in combination, two tasks were identified by logistic regression: (1) ability to execute a free-float phase during a bound, and (2) balancing on one leg. All four motor tasks had high retest reliability, with proportional indices of reliability ranging from 0.92-0.97. No statistically significant difference was found between runners and non-runners for group characteristics such as age, severity of injury (length of PTA), orthopaedic leg injuries and time post-injury (p > 0.05). These characteristics were not shown to influence the ability to run following TBI. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The four motor tasks were strong predictors of running ability. Severity and type of injury were not factors influencing ability to run. This study provides preliminary evidence about the motor tasks which have the potential to be used in a running programme. No casual relationship has been identified. The next step is to investigate whether training in these tasks is effective in the rehabilitation of running following TBI.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1189
DOI: 10.1080/02699050110048546
PubMed URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11516351
ISSN: 0269-9052
1362-301X
Journal Title: Brain Injury
Type: Journal Article
Affiliated Organisations: School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Comparative Study
Appears in Collections:Neurosciences
Rehabilitation

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in EKB are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.