Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1168
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHaddad, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorWickramasinghe, Nilmini-
dc.contributor.authorMuhammad, Imran-
dc.contributor.otherSchaffer, Jonathan-
dc.date2017-05-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-21T01:06:16Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-21T01:06:16Z-
dc.date.issued2017-06-
dc.identifier.citationEpworth Research Institute Research Week 2017; Poster 40: pp 64en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1168-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: While examining IS/IT user satisfaction in healthcare has a lengthy history, measuring user satisfaction with clinical information systems lags behind. This is a key void in today’s healthcare environment given the significant investments in CIS (clinical information systems). BACKGROUND: The healthcare industry is increasingly investing in information systems to enhance patient outcomes and organisational performance. This study qualitatively investigates the relationship between the overall satisfaction and five key aspects of clinical information systems, namely efficiency of use, intuitiveness of graphical user interfaces (GUI), communications, collaboration, and information exchange, and interoperability and compatibility issues. METHOD: An online survey was designed, validated and then conducted to collect data on clinical IT user satisfaction at a large tertiary, not-for-profit, private healthcare group in Australia. The objective of this survey was to develop a valid measurement tool of clinical IT user satisfaction that can be applied for all CIS given that currently no such measurement tool exists. Descriptive statistical techniques were employed to analyse the collected data. RESULTS: A total of 107 respondents out of 250 answered the questionnaire. Responses ranged from satisfied to not very satisfy across the respective systems as well as frequency of use from multiple times a day to one or two times per month and varying technical proficiency. In addition, frequency to contact IT help desk was a dominant response. Further, while significant difference between gender was not apparent but differences between level of proficiency and use were. CONCLUSION: This study set out to evaluate the overall user satisfaction with clinical information systems. Different constructs were considered to evaluate the user satisfaction. A key finding included that intuitive, easy-to-use, and collaboration enabling systems that are supported by training and technical support are most likely to satisfy users.en_US
dc.subjectClinical Information Systemsen_US
dc.subjectIT User Satisfactionen_US
dc.subjectGraphical User Interfacesen_US
dc.subjectCollaborationen_US
dc.subjectInformation Exchangeen_US
dc.subjectInteroperabilityen_US
dc.subjectCompatibility Issuesen_US
dc.subjectCommunicationsen_US
dc.subjectIS/ITen_US
dc.subjectCISen_US
dc.subjectGUIen_US
dc.subjectEfficiencyen_US
dc.subjectMeasurement Toolen_US
dc.subjectChair of Health Informatics Management, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleMeasuring user satisfaction with clinical information systems: What really matters?en_US
dc.typeConference Posteren_US
dc.description.affiliatesFaculty of Health, Deakin Universityen_US
dc.type.studyortrialDescriptive Studyen_US
dc.description.conferencenameEpworth Research Institute Research Week 2017en_US
dc.description.conferencelocationEpworth Research Institute, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Health Informatics

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.